Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
Wed, 04 Aug 2004, by james.knott@rogers.com:
Doug McGarrett wrote:
Why not just use KMail?
Aside from the fact it frequently dies, I don't care for it.
Tried kmail last week, fsckd my mailboxes really good. I fed it the locations of my maildir boxes, expecting to be able to go to each individual box to read mail from it, like I do in Mutt.
Instead kmail took all the mail from all of these boxes and put it all together in 'inbox'. Great, took me a couple of hours to sort that out again (thanks to the great regexp tagging in Mutt, otherwise I would've been really fsckd).
I'm sure graphical apps are great for some people, but until the people who write these apps also write better docs for them I'll thay away as far as possible thank you very much.
Theo
I've had odd problems with kmail too. I'm glad people like it and use it, after all, Linux is about choices and not having a single solution forced on people. -- Jim Sabatke Hire Me!! - See my resume at http://my.execpc.com/~jsabatke Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. NOTE: Please do not email me any attachments with Microsoft extensions. They are deleted on my ISP's server before I ever see them, and no bounce message is sent.