15 Feb
2004
15 Feb
'04
03:36
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 22:20 -0500, Stephen Villano wrote:
*I* used the older version to silently look in on my children's activities when they were online. And I am thankful that I did as I found out that my daughter was involved with an abusive boyfriend. Or should her privacy been paramount and you could console my family after he beat her to death or raped her?
I assume you also tapped her phone and had her followed by private detectives when she was not online
As an employer I am civilly and criminaly responsible for unlawful employee use of my network systems, but and not permitted to monitor the employee activities?!
Which part of "but not covertly" is so hard to understand?