Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (205 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] Re: [opensuse-packaging] Chromium package in openSUSE releases
On Friday 25 November 2011 01:58:18 Sankar P wrote:
On 11/25/2011 at 02:08 PM, in message
<4ECF53F4.8020306@xxxxxxx>,
Ludwig Nussel
<ludwig.nussel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sankar P wrote:
Out-of-the-box (probably bikesheddy) suggestion. Why should
we build
chrome by ourselves at all ? We do not have any patches made
from
SUSE
for chromium which will be in upstream only in future
releases (say
like the Kernel). We can just get the latest Chrome for
openSUSE
from
www.google.com/chrome

Are you saying we should encourage users to install
[proprietary] binary
rpms from random sites on the Internet? Or are you saying we
should
encourage Google to maintain their openSUSE packages in
Factory/update
repos ie make them easily available to users and conform to our
packaging policies?

We definitely can ask Google to maintain their openSUSE specific
rpm build
in OBS. However I doubt if they will be ready to conform to our
packaging
policies etc. My suggestion was the former.

I agree that some may feel paranoid about installing binary rpm
from a third
party site. For most people, Google has a higher level of trust
than some
random site. Also, people already install VLC player from 3rd
party site. I
personally don't feel paranoid about installing chrome from
Google's site.
So I gave that suggestion. I agree that it may not be suitable
for all.

For example, Google's google talk voice RPM that chromium lets you
install both silently registered their repository (to keep it up to
date) and installed a cronjob to re-register their repository if
you remove it, when I looked at its scripts last year. That
deviates too far from acceptable behaviour, in my opinion.

Will
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >