On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:20:12PM +0200, jdd wrote:
Le 09/05/2011 19:02, Jos Poortvliet a écrit :
Didn't I ask to read the FAQ? ;-)
I did, I even read the links (not up to the end... too long)
Which is why I put in the FAQ mentioning freedom of speech,
is that only speech is involved?
Visuals also could be involved. Physical activity as well.
General (and obvious) comments as feedback on how difficult it is to define harassment etc are slightly less useful.
it's an invitation to be more precise. An imprecise document is *worst* than anything.
Not true.
I beg there is a law where the conference is done, so respecting the law is of course mandatory. If we add some rules, it's to be more precise?
No. Again, this is to create an environment where harassment is not welcome, and if it happens, a consequence for that action happening. That's all.
did you really see the case of one people harassing one other people in public during OSC?
It has happened numerous times at other open source conferences, so there's nothing to stop it from happening here unless we specifically let everyone know that it will not be tolerated at all. Which this document is trying to do. If you feel the above posting does not properly address this issue, how do you propose it be changed to do so in a manner in which you would feel acceptable? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org