Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (220 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-packaging] rpmlint no-binary check is broken in factory?
- From: Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:00:18 +0200
- Message-id: <20090914160018.7e2dcae9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Jan Matejek wrote:
I guess the problem is a missing or broken 'magic' module in
rpmlint-mini. Feel free to file a bug report or just fix it yourself
(rpmlint itself is written in python :-))
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
from python buildlog:
python-base.x86_64: W: no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't
contain any binaries.
I'm reasonably sure that python-base actually does contain a number of
binary files (/usr/bin/python, to name one). It seems like no-binary is
now true in all packages.
Somebody please fix it, this flag was pretty useful for determining
which python modules can be switched to noarch ;)
I guess the problem is a missing or broken 'magic' module in
rpmlint-mini. Feel free to file a bug report or just fix it yourself
(rpmlint itself is written in python :-))
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |