Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2011, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Ismail Donmez:
Hi Sven;
On 09/13/2011 11:59 AM, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Dienstag, 13. September 2011, 10:28:16 schrieb Ismail Donmez:
this morning (about 6:00 GMT) I updated from KDE:Release:47. From then on, I could not invoke kate (from KDE4; KDE3's kate was working).
Please use KDE:Distro:Factory, its stable and serving KDE 4.7.1 now.
AFAIR the purpose of KRx was serve users who do not want to act as testing users. There are several reasons for this. Among them that KDF will become unstable at some point and users will be forced to change their repos again which they do not have to do when using KRx.
Users of KDF have to follow the news/wiki in order to know what's in KDF and when it changes which most of them do not want to do and do not have to do when using KRx because the name states the content – unlike KDF.
So advertising KDF instead of KRx will not result in more testers but just more frustration and those that explicitly want to test do so and are more willing to stay up-to-date.
I can't agree here because KDE:Distro:Factory is always supposed to be stable and consistent. If its not, its a bug. But I agree with your point about KR47 and javier is working on partially linking it to KDE:Distro:Factory so people can test latest stable software.
Regards.
Hi, maybe that's a chance to discuss this off properly. Because, to my understanding was and is a factory for testing of future spending. Only when these packages are stable enough, they should release the flow repos. Often it is the other way around. Were sometimes in release: 47 editions of KDE 4.7 already in it that still does not contain or delay in KDF, the users were totally confused here. Also, people should use the whole for some time (like me) do not know what more we ask the questioner to users recommend this. All this does not necessarily help to ignorant to take the uncertainty. Also a very important role spilet in this context, the OBS can be found in any relevant information about these repos. The publication in the media (mailing list, news, forums, wiki) according to the event, here is a point of contributing to uncertainty and may cause confusion. How should people like us (authors in a wiki) to bring it closer to the user correctly when the project team is not even a common understanding on the subject? -- Grüße aus' m Schwabenland ↓ → Lisufa, der Linuxsusefan ↓ ################################## ********************************** ....::: openSUSE Member :::..... ************************************************************* Die 'SuS(i)E & KDE' sei mit euch, wo immer ihr auch seid .... *************************************************************