Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (845 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Load_Cycle_Count changes under B2 (was Re: Hard drive load cycles - Small test suggestion)
- From: "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 00:36:21 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0805050033480.18629@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2008-05-04 at 19:53 +0200, James PEARSON wrote:
Then you got wrong results: if the disk is busy, the disk doesn't "cycle". You have to test it under typical use, specially low usage.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIHjpmtTMYHG2NR9URAmApAJwMJekcy2Zt2fAGJ8D3SIQ7cb+dGQCfbFO5
/WYS2taMB7+DVysUtYwTq6E=
=Wq3j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2008-05-04 at 19:53 +0200, James PEARSON wrote:
If you are testing openSUSE 11 beta releases, would you please do a
check on your hard drive cycles?
In order to answer your queston (Load_Cycle_Count variations as seen by
smartctl under B2 )
I decided to recompile the kernel as that is a fairly heavy loadwork.
Then you got wrong results: if the disk is busy, the disk doesn't "cycle". You have to test it under typical use, specially low usage.
- -- Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIHjpmtTMYHG2NR9URAmApAJwMJekcy2Zt2fAGJ8D3SIQ7cb+dGQCfbFO5
/WYS2taMB7+DVysUtYwTq6E=
=Wq3j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |