Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (420 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] suggested work around for zypper/libzypp
- From: Igor Jagec <igorm5@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:33:19 +0200
- Message-id: <1191547999.3694.5.camel@munja>
On Čet, 2007-10-04 at 19:08 -0500, Rajko M. wrote:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 06:35:28 pm Igor Jagec wrote:
> > BTW what is the difference between 'zypper update' and 'zypper update -t
> > package?
> 'zypper update' == 'zypper update -t patch'
Meaning, the patch option pulls delta rpms? I saw some .delta.rpm
and .patch.rpm packages in Zypper's output so I'm asking :)
If so, that's great because, as I figured, that consumes less
bandwidth :)
> > Which one of these 2 commands is used by GNOME/KDE update
> > applet?
> Whatever is for patches :-)
I experienced some package removal while I was playing with that applet
on Factory, so I was just asking :)
> It will not install packages that doesn't meet dependencies.
> All checks are done in advance as you will notice.
That's great, thanks!
--
Igor Jagec
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 06:35:28 pm Igor Jagec wrote:
> > BTW what is the difference between 'zypper update' and 'zypper update -t
> > package?
> 'zypper update' == 'zypper update -t patch'
Meaning, the patch option pulls delta rpms? I saw some .delta.rpm
and .patch.rpm packages in Zypper's output so I'm asking :)
If so, that's great because, as I figured, that consumes less
bandwidth :)
> > Which one of these 2 commands is used by GNOME/KDE update
> > applet?
> Whatever is for patches :-)
I experienced some package removal while I was playing with that applet
on Factory, so I was just asking :)
> It will not install packages that doesn't meet dependencies.
> All checks are done in advance as you will notice.
That's great, thanks!
--
Igor Jagec
| < Previous | Next > |