Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (420 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] suggested work around for zypper/libzypp
- From: "Miquel A. Noguera" <miquel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:19:50 +0200
- Message-id: <200710041019.51140.miquel@xxxxxxxxx>
El Jueves, 4 de Octubre de 2007 06:01:47 Cristian Rodriguez escribió:
> Gabriel . escribió:
> > IMHO, using the 'smart' approach would be better.
>
> No, you end having almost the same problem.. We have explained this many
> times, smart is **no** model to follow for a package manager, it is
> inconsistent and it does **not work** properly in 64 bit.
Cristian, that is what does **not work** properly in 64 bit? Are you meaning
smart (or apt) implementation itself or is it about download first / install
later concept?
In any case, where can I find documentation on these arguments against smart
(and maybe apt) as a package manager model?
Regards.
Miquel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gabriel . escribió:
> > IMHO, using the 'smart' approach would be better.
>
> No, you end having almost the same problem.. We have explained this many
> times, smart is **no** model to follow for a package manager, it is
> inconsistent and it does **not work** properly in 64 bit.
Cristian, that is what does **not work** properly in 64 bit? Are you meaning
smart (or apt) implementation itself or is it about download first / install
later concept?
In any case, where can I find documentation on these arguments against smart
(and maybe apt) as a package manager model?
Regards.
Miquel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |