On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:47 +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
That's ok, but it should have been clarified at the beginning of the development stage, I think. Now, 17 days before the release, it is probably too late to get them fixed for 2.20, which will be included in openSUSE 10.3.
Moreover, on what basis should we distinguish between GNOME bugs to report upstream, and GNOME bugs to report on bugzilla?
Since the number of bugs i see in opensuse 10.3 is quite high (and i am affected by at least 5 different _annoying_ bugs: g-p-m not showing suspend/hibernate for laptops, /dev/null permissions after hibernate, btdownloader not working, iwl3945 breaking suspend ... etc) i personally would like to see the release postponed rather then releasing something that you know won`t work almost perfectly (like 10.2 did).
With kind regards, Alberto
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org