Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (723 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] State of 10.1 (Was: Re: [opensuse-factory] Conflicts only resolvable one by one?)
  • From: Martin Schlander <suse@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:38:25 +0100
  • Message-id: <200603241838.25527.suse@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Thursday 23 March 2006 21:46, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I'm currently trying to get an overview of where we are with SUSE
> Linux 10.1. If you have issues that you consider real showstoppers,
> please tell them here publically - with bugzilla numbers if possible.

- Networkmanager unable to connect to unencrypted networks:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158892

- Ressource consumption of the package manager:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=153708

I'd like to add to this that I just tried to add factory to rug:

rug sa --type=yum
http://mirrors.kernel.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse
factory

The progress bar stopped at 33% - but my harddisk, cpu and ram (512 megs)
consumption ran amok - using at a time all my 500 megs of swap - I powered
off after 20 minutes as I couldn't get it to stop - not even
ctrl+alt+backspace would do it.

Am I the only one to experience something like this?

Generally it seems to me that the packagemanager - whether using rug or yast
is considerably slower and more ressource demanding than before - and it's
not like it was blazingly fast then.

Another thing is that I had already added factory as a yast installation
source - but it does not show up in "rug service-list" as I believe it
should.

The urls for yast and rug seem to be different as rug needs the last /suse - I
wonder if this has any relevance.

cb400f

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups