Hi Guys, I have an problem here. I have installed oracle on Suse 7.1. As you know 7.1 has glibc2.2 and Oracle is compiled to support under glibc 2.1. I would like compile my sources using glibc2.1 and link with Oracle. My Question is: How do i install glibc2.1 kit under suse?. How do i compile my sources under glibc2.1 libs?. Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks Kumar
* Kumarasamy Paramasivam (param@commvault.com) [010513 12:38]: ->Hi Guys, -> I have an problem here. I have installed oracle on Suse 7.1. As you know ->7.1 has glibc2.2 and Oracle is compiled to support under glibc 2.1. I would ->like compile my sources using glibc2.1 and link with Oracle. My Question is: ->How do i install glibc2.1 kit under suse?. -> ->How do i compile my sources under glibc2.1 libs?. -> -> ->Any help would be highly appreciated. Glibc 2.2 is downward compatible with 2.1.X so you shouldn't need to recompile anything. Your 2.1 binaries should work with 2.2...it's that 2.2 binaries don't work with 2.1...that would be the issue. I believe if you check the archives someone was talking about what you would need to get Oracle running. You can also email mha@suse.com ... Michael is the resident SuSE expert on Oracle. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org ----- If two men agree on everything, you can be sure that only one of them is doing the thinking.
Kumarasamy Paramasivam wrote:
Hi Guys, I have an problem here. I have installed oracle on Suse 7.1. As you know 7.1 has glibc2.2 and Oracle is compiled to support under glibc 2.1. I would like compile my sources using glibc2.1 and link with Oracle. My Question is: How do i install glibc2.1 kit under suse?.
How do i compile my sources under glibc2.1 libs?.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
a) wrong list, use suse-oracle@suse.com b) http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/ If you had used the suse support resources (e.g. SDB, keyword ORACLE) you would have found it. c) Ben Rosenberg is wrong. Oracle is relinked during installation and that's the part that causes problems, binaries would of course run fine on the newer glibc.
* Michael Hasenstein (mha@suse.com) [010514 09:51]: -> ->c) Ben Rosenberg is wrong. Oracle is relinked during installation and ->that's the part that causes problems, binaries would of course run fine ->on the newer glibc. -> Micheal, I know that the older glibc binaries would run fine under the newer glibc...it's backwards compatible. I was talking about binaries compiled with the new glibc interacting with the older binaries compiled for 2.1.X .. it was speculation and I pointed him to you. You didn't read the mail. *sigh* Regards, -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org ----- If two men agree on everything, you can be sure that only one of them is doing the thinking.
participants (3)
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Kumarasamy Paramasivam
-
Michael Hasenstein