Fwd: Re: [SLE] Roadrunner, Linksys, SUSE 8.2
Hi, Thanks for the speedy reply, Bernd, and everyone else who wrote back. It appears, on closer inspection, that the problem lies on the ISP end. (Linksys indicated an internet connection, but there was no IP address assigned in its firmware reports.) I found (less than a week after installation) that even directly hooking up cable did not work. On top of that, my wife (who watches much more television than I do) complained of "snow" on cable. They'll send someone out to troubleshoot/repair the cable Tuesday next. The moral (I hope) is: "Always do your 'idiot checks' first!" Nevertheless, it was reassuring to learn that things were probably OK on my end as everything people suggested I check on (e.g., nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf) was there. Thanks again! Steve
Dump your cards configs, and set up your card from scratch using Yast! I say this only because I have experienced countless hours and days of pain trying to tweak something that is really simple.
If you can figure it out with this, great! If you need details on it let me know. I have a Linksys RT31P2 (wired with phone ports) and a Linksys WRT54G (wireless) that is connected to the wired router. Both are on different networks (15.1, 1.1), and both router are set up by default to serve DHCP for the internet and the network. I also have setup in the past both eth and wlan cards on these routers.
What I'm telling you is the simplest and fastest way to get it done. You can tweak it later if you need to.
Bernd
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
On Friday 21 October 2005 12:06 pm, Steve Miller wrote: <snip>
It appears, on closer inspection, that the problem lies on the ISP end. <snip> On top of that, my wife (who watches much more television than I do) complained of "snow" on cable. They'll send someone out to troubleshoot/repair the cable Tuesday next.
When you see pixelation or snow on the TV, you've got a bad cable somewhere. We use Road Runner for us and many of our clients; it's a great value and pretty reliable, even though there is no traditional SLA. Ask you neighbors if they are having problems as well; the issue could be a splitter on the pole, a bad amp, water in the plant, etc. When the engineer comes, he should do the following: 1. Use the hot keys on your cable box to display all of the line levels hitting the converter. Ask him if any of the readings are out of the ordinary. Signal-to-noise ratio and the line level itself are the two key measures. 2. Plug his big tester into the house end of your drop, to see what's what up the line. It is not uncommon to have water seep into the drop, in which case they will roll a big truck to replace the cable from the pole to your house, and check further up to see where the leak is. 3. Check any splitters you may have; they go bad as do the cables. If you have a long drop, or your line levels are marginal, see if the tech won't install a powered amplifier for you. You'll need a GFI outlet on the inside of the house where the drop comes in to your first splitter, but this will add a few db of signal strength and improve your S/N ratio. HTH, Mark
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own
knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP
support).
--
Jerry Feldman
On Friday 21 October 2005 3:35 pm, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP support). Just to add to this, this is specifically Itanium support for PPP (eg. pppd) not x86 or other platforms. -- Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
Jerry Feldman wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 3:35 pm, Jerry Feldman wrote:
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP support). Just to add to this, this is specifically Itanium support for PPP (eg. pppd) not x86 or other platforms.
PPP is simply software that talks to the serial port. Even if a binary is not there, it shouldn't be too difficult to compile from source.
On Friday 21 October 2005 3:55 pm, James Knott wrote:
Jerry Feldman wrote:
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP support).
Why wouldn't it? AFAIK, it should be (specifically pppd). A customer was told by a competitor of SuSE that PPPD is broken on Itanium.
I don't have a lot of information, such as are we dealing with a single
native serial port, or are we dealing with some multi-serial board.
--
Jerry Feldman
Jerry Feldman wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 3:55 pm, James Knott wrote:
Jerry Feldman wrote:
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP support). Why wouldn't it? AFAIK, it should be (specifically pppd). A customer was told by a competitor of SuSE that PPPD is broken on Itanium.
That makes one wonder about the accuracy of the claim.
I don't have a lot of information, such as are we dealing with a single native serial port, or are we dealing with some multi-serial board.
On Friday 21 October 2005 4:12 pm, James Knott wrote:
Jerry Feldman wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2005 3:55 pm, James Knott wrote:
Jerry Feldman wrote:
I was just asked a question regarding PPP (on RHEL3) and for my own knowledge would like to know if SLES9 is supporting PPP (eg. dial in PPP support).
Why wouldn't it?
AFAIK, it should be (specifically pppd). A customer was told by a competitor of SuSE that PPPD is broken on Itanium.
That makes one wonder about the accuracy of the claim. I am researching that also. It could be an issue specifically with the Itanium and the serial driver and (in this case the 2.4 kernel). It could possibly be a 64-bit issue.
In a very generic sense I would like to know if anyone on this list has used
an Itanium SLES9 (of SLES8) as a dialup server.
--
Jerry Feldman
participants (4)
-
James Knott
-
Jerry Feldman
-
L. Mark Stone
-
Steve Miller