I joined the OpenSUSE mailing list after suseforums staff made me aware of the dialog regarding official forums. I believe I've read every comment on the issue via the archives and live list. I've been silent so far, aside from some limited public dialog on suseforums.net and private dialog with suseforums.net staff. From some comments from key contributors to the mailing list, it appears the decision has already been made and the mailing list is simply looking to validate the decision they've already made by getting comments from the major players impacted. I won't attempt to access the state of decision, other than to comment that it was communicated to me that my input would be appreciated. 1) community An official sponsored forum probably won't do much for a sense of community, unless one defines a community as having some corporate sanction. Most folks don't think the existing Novell forums do much for the community, and they're officially sponsored. Community is more than Linux...in fact, IMO community doesn't really start until you've stepped outside Linux, and began to explore each other in ways that don't depend on technical subject matter. It's a dialog about music, movies, books, philosophy, or politics that begins to truly define us, not what distro we use and how much we know about it. No corporate sponsored official community I've seen can bring that diversity to a forum, although one might bend things a bit and say the Ubuntu or Gentoo forums do. They aren't "corporate" in the traditional sense though, so this would be an important question to get answered: "How much control/influence would Novell/SUSE exercise over format/content in exchange for 'official' sponsorship?" 2) competition between boards Is an official community supposed to eliminate or replace the existing forums? If so, the existing official Novell forums haven't. If the issue is multiple discussion boards, it's far more likely that opening a second official forum will simply add one to the mix, not provide the consolidation intended. 3) investment of those boards already running Those existing forums have made a significant financial investment in the SUSE community. I don't imagine there is financial compensation in the mix for hosting contracts or hardware investments to which those individuals might be contractually bound. They'll be expected to eat any commitment they've already made. Given that, wouldn't you expect them to simply continue to run the boards? If they're paying anyway, they might as well be running a board. This could preclude them from joining the new official discussion board and bringing their expertise there. It also runs the risk of diluting the pool of those commited individuals who moderate those forums, resulting in less quality, not more. Running a discussion board is a skill too, just like teaching, or coding. Time goes on, things change. The time invested in the existing forums is significant as well, and has provided a positive community atmosphere for SUSE to date. If one is thinking of replacing them, or providing them competition, wouldn't it be nice to have better reasons than "we need a single place to go" or "it will build the community"? Who can justify these reasons with any substantiative data? 4) what problem would "official" forums be designed to fix? Building something new typically means better. What would the new official forums be designed to fix? How would they fix it? Without clear definition of these answers, it's quite likely any expected benefits would not materialize. I hear people say "having an official forums would be good", but they're not specific about what problems exist that "official" forums will solve. Assume the official forums are up. What will make them better than the official forums we have today? The Novell forums aren't popular, and don't provide the answers to the very few real reasons I've heard for having new official forums. What will make the new forums unique enough to help? Or would there just be another official board diluting the community? 5) is a one size fits all solution what people want? (the size of linuxquestions) I know for myself, the larger the board, the less comfortable I feel. I don't want it too small, but a place like linuxquestions.org is just too big for me. I'm looking for more intimacy, and I like to get to know folks. The Ubuntu forums and Gentoo forums are of the size now that one must spend hours a day if one wants to just browse new posts, looking for items of interest. It wouldn't bother everyone...but it's something to consider. 6) what's changed to make this an issue now? Given SUSE's been around for some time, and the community seems to be quite alive and well, what's different now that makes this issue important? If not having an Ubuntu-like discussion board was the kiss of death for a distro, we'd have a lot of casualties...such as Fedora Core and Mandriva. 7) is it a decision that can't be postponed without penalty? If this is not time critical, can the decision simply be postponed until the justification is more clear than "we don't have one, so we should"? 8) choice Hasn't the Linux community always demonstrated a definite preference for choice? Given that, new official forums would provide another choice, but is another choice similar to what we have already but with a logo gonna really provide value? I tend to believe having 100 Linux distros goes beyond choice, and simply dilutes a precious resource pool. Would we be traveling the same path...choice without diversity? 9) opportunity and timing Up until Novell purchased SUSE, SUSE did not have official forums, so some dedicated SUSE lovers filled the need. Novell tried with official forums after the purchase, but it never took off. Is it possible the time for making that happen without fragmenting the community has simply passed? Could the Ubuntu forums or Gentoo forums as we know them have been created long after smaller, less "official" forums had been filling the need? Sometimes, the moment for certain decisions has simply passed, and the opportunity is gone. 10) quality of support Some people with whom I've dialogued concerning the idea of new "official" forums have implied (or directly assumed) that official forums would provide a higher quality of support than what we have today. The assumption of better support or access to more advanced expertise can only be fulfilled if something is radically different about the proposed new "official" forums. Are there going to be Linux developers monitoring the forums and participating in problem resolution? Are the members of the new forums going to be immune to the time/effort issues associated with answering tough questions and be immune to burnout? In other words, unless there are some clear differentiating factors with the proposed new "official" forums, I think it unlikely we would see any quality of support improvement over existing forums. 11) weighing the "user" vote I'd suppose any poll or user vote would favor "official" forums. Why not? If I had no experience from the inside of running a discussion board and trying to build an online community, I'd simply vote yes without thinking. I never wanted to run a discussion board...sort of backed into it, and a tough situation with a lot of misunderstanding led to my current role. I participated in the birth of suseforums.net out of a real love for the community, and I hope my viewpoint today reflects that love of community more than ever. It, on the one hand, pushes me to favor a single place to go...as I spend a lot of time in the Gentoo forums personally. I doubt anyone can see the Ubuntu or Gentoo discussion boards and not be impressed by their communities. On the other hand, my prior experience with suselinuxsupport.de, and with suseforums.net lately has led me to believe that the SUSE community is no less served by the existing situation than Ubuntu or Gentoo. Culture is subtle thing, and a discussion board's culture is a huge part of it's appeal, or lack of it. The existing SUSE discussion boards differ in culture (both private and public), and that provides an advantage for SUSE that Gentoo or Ubuntu can't offer. Choice works given the current number of options; more choices, or less choices might not. 12) body of knowledge, embrace and extend? Ideally, the "encyclopedia" of knowledge would be searchable and indexed. It's possible the current situation with Web-based SUSE user communities might be worsened, and not bettered by the pursuit of a "official" forum. Given the questions and answers already posted to existing forums, mailing lists, and USENET will never be consolidated into one place, could the concept of a single web presence to go for SUSE support, information, and answers be better served by an extension of the Wiki? Perhaps a search function could be coded and built for the Wiki that searches the current (and future) known repositories of SUSE knowledge (mailing lists, forums, USENET, etc.) and returns the results through the Wiki interface as clickable links? By limiting the search to known repositories, we could create a faster, more focused search than is currently attainable by global search engines like Google. A user could be directed to the Community page of the Wiki in the event his/her search is unproductive to engage those communities directly. This particular idea of course, might only be the beginning of a better idea that presents itself in dialog. We preserve the choice the Open Source community has come to expect, but virtualize the interface? I would suspect this comes closer to a solution that all of us (especially the existing web forums) can get behind and fully commit to. Is it possible, or probable, that the _best_ solution is to build on what we have, and not compete with or replace what exists, but embrace and extend the SUSE community? Backwards compatibility? (LOL) Keith -- Keith Kastorff kastorff@yahoo.com
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:43:36PM -0500, Keith Kastorff wrote:
1) community
An official sponsored forum probably won't do much for a sense of community, unless one defines a community as having some corporate sanction.
We are talking about the openSUSE comunity, not about Novell
2) competition between boards
Is an official community supposed to eliminate or replace the existing forums?
No. <snip> As all the rest of the comments are made as if they are to replace the existing ones and/or talk about Novell, they are moot. We are talking about openSUSE forums. We are at the stage on wether or not to have them. Again: There is NO intention to close down any existing site. Diversity is a GOOD thing. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
Hi, On 2006-02-22 at 20:43:36 -0500, Keith Kastorff wrote (shortened):
4) what problem would "official" forums be designed to fix?
The following is just my personal opinion and experience. I usually don't use forums at all but after looking at some SUSE community forums I found that there is some interesting user feedback and questions where I can give useful answers in my area of knowledge. The problem is that I have no time to monitor more of the forums because it just takes too much time. So I have the choice with the current situation: - don't participate in forum discussions at all and stay with mailinglists only - choose one forum to monitor (but which one) In forums I found bugreports which should have been in bugzilla.novell.com since a long time but the information was hidden in the forum in that special case and didn't find the way to my desk. That's one of the reasons why an official forum would make my life easier. CU, Wolfgang -- SUSE LINUX GmbH -o) Tel: +49-(0)911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstr. 5 /\\ Fax: +49-(0)911-740 53 679 90409 Nuernberg, Germany _\_v simply change to www.suse.com
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
- choose one forum to monitor (but which one)
same. It may be more problematic to choose one amount many non official than to have our. jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
Hi, On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, jdd wrote:
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
- choose one forum to monitor (but which one)
same.
It may be more problematic to choose one amount many non official than to have our.
One of our goals is to integrate the existing forums into the community. All those forums are monitored, and they are monitored very well. You can say generally: a forum is "a crew with a moderator in the middle". So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel". The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, jdd wrote:
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
- choose one forum to monitor (but which one) same. It may be more problematic to choose one amount many non official than to have our.
One of our goals is to integrate the existing forums into the community. All those forums are monitored, and they are monitored very well. You can say generally: a forum is "a crew with a moderator in the middle".
So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
100% ACK
In the end, what really counts is to have the various parts of our community connected somehow, have
communication happening in all directions.
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\
Pascal Bleser wrote:
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
100% ACK
In the end, what really counts is to have the various parts of our community connected somehow, have communication happening in all directions.
I don't think it will works like that. Moderators do they job, moderate... If we must have communication _we_ must do that ourselves, that needs at least one of us subscribed to each forum and having time to browse. but is not this discussion over? jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:40:04PM +0100, jdd wrote:
I don't think it will works like that. Moderators do they job, moderate...
If we must have communication _we_ must do that ourselves,
Who is this 'we' you talk about? I asume you are talking about the openSUSE comunity. If _we_ must do it, then why not our _own_ forum.
but is not this discussion over? This will come back again and again for at least the next 5 years, no matter what will be decided or done. :-(
houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
houghi wrote:
This will come back again and again for at least the next 5 years, no matter what will be decided or done. :-(
if we have our own forum, even dead, this will stop :-) jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:30:21PM +0100, jdd wrote:
houghi wrote:
This will come back again and again for at least the next 5 years, no matter what will be decided or done. :-(
if we have our own forum, even dead, this will stop :-)
If we have our own forum, people will start asking why there are so many forums and why they do not get together and why it was started in the first place. if all the others stop, the question will be why there are no other forums besides ... houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
Hi, On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, jdd wrote:
houghi wrote:
This will come back again and again for at least the next 5 years, no matter what will be decided or done. :-(
if we have our own forum, even dead, this will stop :-)
Maybe you can starve one eternal question with the creation of an "own" forum, but with doing that you will contribute NOTHING into the task of "gathering together" what already exists. Don't forget: you can't CREATE a community - you just have the chance to BUILD one. From the bricks which are already there. Putting another brick into the sand leaves the main task to others and makes the task even bigger. And yes, the chances are big that the forum you like to create will be born dead. A good forum is a happening - it just happens if there are good moderators, not if there are good designers. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Don't forget: you can't CREATE a community - you just have the chance to BUILD one. From the bricks which are already there.
I don't like forums, I never asked for one. but people asked for and so I beleive a community already exists. I think that any communication medium asked by a community member willing to take it in charge should be created, whatever it is (is pysically possible) thats all. and I wont argue on this. jdd -- http://www.dodin.net http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html http://lucien.dodin.net http://fr.susewiki.org/index.php?title=Gérer_ses_photos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, jdd wrote:
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
- choose one forum to monitor (but which one)
same.
It may be more problematic to choose one amount many non official than to have our.
One of our goals is to integrate the existing forums into the community. All those forums are monitored, and they are monitored very well. You can say generally: a forum is "a crew with a moderator in the middle".
So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
Cheers -e
Great idea, I'm 100% behind this! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD/dt2lJ5U46oLZWMRAqcQAJ9viuwtbofjAgdCxI/c5VCNTq+sMgCg000D qSZe0M4aaA1tvh3HmZFdZbA= =YH6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:01 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, jdd wrote:
Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
- choose one forum to monitor (but which one)
same.
It may be more problematic to choose one amount many non official than to have our.
One of our goals is to integrate the existing forums into the community. All those forums are monitored, and they are monitored very well. You can say generally: a forum is "a crew with a moderator in the middle".
So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
Cheers -e
Our suseforums.net staff has long been advised to refer folks to official bug tracking mechanisms, but it's historically been advising the original poster. I'm in full agreement that this purpose would be better served if staff were more active in the exchange of information to/from the "official community". Aside from increasing suseforums.net staff awareness on this idea, what would be our first steps toward ensuring better cooperation and information exchange? Keith -- Keith Kastorff kastorff@yahoo.com
Hi, On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Keith Kastorff wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:01 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
One of our goals is to integrate the existing forums into the community. All those forums are monitored, and they are monitored very well. You can say generally: a forum is "a crew with a moderator in the middle".
So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
Our suseforums.net staff has long been advised to refer folks to official bug tracking mechanisms, but it's historically been advising the original poster. I'm in full agreement that this purpose would be better served if staff were more active in the exchange of information to/from the "official community". Aside from increasing suseforums.net staff awareness on this idea, what would be our first steps toward ensuring better cooperation and information exchange?
Build more "awareness" at the other forum moderators about the OpenSUSE Wiki and mailinglists, make them give more pointers to docs and solutions at www.opensuse.org... And vice versa: give more pointers to interesting forum happenings into the OpenSUSE mailinglists, make the forum moderators write Wiki pages from interesting forum happenings... Some "mailers" should visit the forums in their spare time (I do this with linux-club.de, suseforums.net and forums.suselinuxsupport.de, but usually I can't fully work through the whole "View New Posts" task), some "forumers" should subscribe/visit the mailinglists, and the forum moderators should act as the "wanderers between the two worlds". As Pascal pointed out: communication is the glue, and the "com" before "munication" is meaning: bi-directional. A task not only for the forum moderators, but also for us "mailers". Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
On 2/23/06, Eberhard Moenkeberg
Build more "awareness" at the other forum moderators about the OpenSUSE Wiki and mailinglists, make them give more pointers to docs and solutions at www.opensuse.org... And vice versa: give more pointers to interesting forum happenings into the OpenSUSE mailinglists, make the forum moderators write Wiki pages from interesting forum happenings...
Some "mailers" should visit the forums in their spare time (I do this with linux-club.de, suseforums.net and forums.suselinuxsupport.de, but usually I can't fully work through the whole "View New Posts" task), some "forumers" should subscribe/visit the mailinglists, and the forum moderators should act as the "wanderers between the two worlds".
As Pascal pointed out: communication is the glue, and the "com" before "munication" is meaning: bi-directional. A task not only for the forum moderators, but also for us "mailers".
I am an admin at Suseforums.net along with Keith. I wanted to respond with my ideas. I am curious as to why there is such a push to have an "official" forum. Why not try out first what Pascal & Eberhard were saying and raise the communication level between the different forums and the mailing list. Try to work with what is already existing instead of adding and diluting things some more. If after a few months things aren't working any in the way the community wants, revisit this discussion and then come up with a plan for or against an "official" forum. These are just my thoughts. -Justin
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:33:46PM -0500, Justin Larmon wrote:
I am an admin at Suseforums.net along with Keith. I wanted to respond with my ideas. I am curious as to why there is such a push to have an "official" forum. Why not try out first what Pascal & Eberhard were saying and raise the communication level between the different forums and the mailing list. Try to work with what is already existing instead of adding and diluting things some more. If after a few months things aren't working any in the way the community wants, revisit this discussion and then come up with a plan for or against an "official" forum. These are just my thoughts.
I peronaly do not see it as a 'push'. I see it as a discussion to find out what our possibilaties are. If it were really a push, then the forums would have been made and no questions asked. That the questions ARE asked is due to the fact that the not overseeing the existing ones is very important. It is (I think) more important then yes or no to having own forums. It should be about bringing the comunity much closer together. At this moment there is an undecided. Therev is however dialoge and that is always a good thing. At this moment I can see several scenarios, concerning the the forums: 1) Yes, we make forum.opensuse.org 2) No, we don't make forum.opensuse.org The above could be decide after a trial period, as described above. 3) We make one, but the subjects are limited to opensuse related issues, so no technical things, only comunity things The last one would be something like the already existing opensuse mailinglists, so no technical questions. It would give a voice to those who are unwilling to use an email-list. Now before you start shouting: "If they want to be eard, they should subscribe!", hear me out. This is about openSUSE. It is not about suse-linux-e. And not even all mailinglists must or should have a sister-forum. The objections might be that things could be posted twice. My answer to that is: the moderators should be looking out for things that happen on that forum (That is about openSUSE, not about technical questions) and report it back to the list. This should NOT exclude the role of the existing forums. As far as I can see, the other forums out there are about SUSE. I am talking about a forum about openSUSE, not SUSE. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
On 2/24/06, Keith Kastorff
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:01 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
Our suseforums.net staff has long been advised to refer folks to official bug tracking mechanisms, but it's historically been advising the original poster. I'm in full agreement that this purpose would be better served if staff were more active in the exchange of information to/from the "official community". Aside from increasing suseforums.net staff awareness on this idea, what would be our first steps toward ensuring better cooperation and information exchange?
Pascal & Eberhard? You have both talked (in this thread and earlier) about that we should build on the old, don't harm existing forums, etc. But how do you propose that that will happen? I haven't seen any details of this "enforce the communication between the moderators and the 'community kernel'". How is any such thing going to be 'enforced'? The one thing the web forum discussion has shown , is that there is a genuine need to try to consolidate a splintered SUSE community, through some mechanism. I am not trying to troll, I just haven't seen anybody explain the step from where we are now and where we will be in 6, 12, 18 months, going down this path. If one can answer this question satisfactorily, then we have less need for our own forum. If one can't, then Houghi is right, the Web forum discussion will be eternal until we have one. Peter 'Pflodo' Flodin
Hi, On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Peter Flodin wrote:
On 2/24/06, Keith Kastorff
wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:01 +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: So let's "use" the existing structure: We should try to "train" the moderators in using bugzilla and/or forwarding relevant forum postings to the mailing lists, and let's enforce the communication between the moderators and the "community kernel".
The moderators should see our "official community" as a "fallback knowledge database" for their forum's problem discussions, and vice versa keep us informed about interesting problem/solution happenings within their forums.
Our suseforums.net staff has long been advised to refer folks to official bug tracking mechanisms, but it's historically been advising the original poster. I'm in full agreement that this purpose would be better served if staff were more active in the exchange of information to/from the "official community". Aside from increasing suseforums.net staff awareness on this idea, what would be our first steps toward ensuring better cooperation and information exchange?
Pascal & Eberhard?
You have both talked (in this thread and earlier) about that we should build on the old, don't harm existing forums, etc. But how do you propose that that will happen? I haven't seen any details of this "enforce the communication between the moderators and the 'community kernel'". How is any such thing going to be 'enforced'?
For me, this enforcement is a very simple personal step: I have started to read the existing forums, and sometimes to write where I think I should.
The one thing the web forum discussion has shown , is that there is a genuine need to try to consolidate a splintered SUSE community, through some mechanism.
The mechanism is: "diffunding" into the other side - we (as individuals) into the forums, the forum moderators into the mailinglists.
I am not trying to troll, I just haven't seen anybody explain the step from where we are now and where we will be in 6, 12, 18 months, going down this path. If one can answer this question satisfactorily, then we have less need for our own forum. If one can't, then Houghi is right, the Web forum discussion will be eternal until we have one.
Take a look into the forums, try to find "your" themes there, and follow the threads for a while. You will find a "society" with more people speaking than here, with a good discipline and active "education". It is not my world, but the "living" there has a very high cultural level, and their themes are our themes. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
On 2/23/06, Keith Kastorffwrote: > I joined the OpenSUSE mailing list after suseforums staff made me aware > of the dialog regarding official forums. I think that you should mention that you are an Administrator of suseforums, and have posted about 5% of all messages on that forum, and (quite understandably) a staunch defender of the forum and associated community: http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?s=9950955ec4ed435130242d75f4d16355&showtopic=20594&view=findpost&p=115472 I am in no way dismissing your following points because of this, but I think we should know you are more than a casual member of suseforums. I should also declare that I believe we should have a web forum, and was the first to propose so on this mailing list back in August: http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse/2005-Aug/0917.html Most of my arguments for doing so haven't changed. But responding to some of your points: > 1) community > ...in fact, IMO community doesn't really start until you've stepped > outside Linux, and began to explore each other in ways that don't depend > on technical subject matter. It's a dialog about music, movies, books, > philosophy, or politics that begins to truly define us, not what distro > we use and how much we know about it. I understand your point, at the moment most of our community is happening in this mailing list, which does not allow any such diversions. On the other side, most of us are not looking to create a social club. > "How much control/influence would > Novell/SUSE exercise over format/content in exchange for 'official' > sponsorship?" Other than standard terms of service that are already on openSUSE.org - none This would be a community forum, sponsorship is largely infrastructure. But will extend into having links to the forum from distro Welcome pages, etc, that is problematic to link to when not controlled. > 3) investment of those boards already running This is the best argument against an openSUSE forum. If in 2-3 years the openSUSE forum grows to an Ubuntu or Gentoo type forum, then the current SUSE forums I think will get hurt. There will always be niche forums covering things that can never be discussed or linked to legally in the jurisdictions that Novell is incorporated. > 4) what problem would "official" forums be designed to fix? Whilst SUSE staff will not be employed to moderate the forum. Many would take part, in an offical forum, that would otherwise not. As proven by previous post in this thread. > 5) is a one size fits all solution what people want? (the size of > linuxquestions) Yes the bigger the better in my view. Just keep splitting categories if some area gets too busy. If we had enough posts to support Hardware->Video Cards-->ATI I see no issue. > 6) what's changed to make this an issue now? > > Given SUSE's been around for some time, and the community seems to be > quite alive and well, what's different now that makes this issue > important? openSUSE happened. Peter 'Pflodo' Flodin.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:59:28PM +1100, Peter Flodin wrote:
On 2/23/06, Keith Kastorff
wrote: I joined the OpenSUSE mailing list after suseforums staff made me aware of the dialog regarding official forums.
I think that you should mention that you are an Administrator of suseforums,
That indeed would have clarified a lot.
3) investment of those boards already running
This is the best argument against an openSUSE forum.
If in 2-3 years the openSUSE forum grows to an Ubuntu or Gentoo type forum, then the current SUSE forums I think will get hurt. There will always be niche forums covering things that can never be discussed or linked to legally in the jurisdictions that Novell is incorporated.
And for that we have to wait. What is the reason of existance of these forums? I have no idea what it is. I can _imagine_ several options. 1) To help other people with SUSE. I then see no problem. If helping people is really the sole purpose, then the place where that happens should not matter. 2) To run a suse forum and if possible be the largest one Here it would be a problem. Every other forum will be seen as competition. The running of the forum is the sole purpose to keep the forum running. I hope that all the forums are there to help other people with SUSE. If openSUSE helps people to find solutions as good or better, then I would say: go ahead. Will it take time? You bet. 2-3 years is a good estimate, I think. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
On 2/23/06, Keith Kastorff
4) what problem would "official" forums be designed to fix?
Problems like this: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?threadid=285930 To me, that thread you started exemplifies the biggest reason why we need our own forum - control & stability. Thanks, for posting here, I have learned more from your post than the web forum post here for several months. Peter 'Pflodo' Flodin
participants (9)
-
Eberhard Moenkeberg
-
houghi
-
jdd
-
Justin Larmon
-
Keith Kastorff
-
Pascal Bleser
-
Peter Flodin
-
Storm
-
Wolfgang Rosenauer