-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all: I check this page -> http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/freshrpms/index.html and for suse 10.1 x86_32 I see a lot of files like this: FA_clxclient-debuginfo-1.0.2-4.x86_64.rpm ^^^^^^ is it normal? cheers - -- Chema Ollés Usuario Linux: #198057 Linux 2.6.14-rc3-g82984114 #1 SMP Sat Oct 8 15:39:19 CEST 2005 i686 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDX0zp65SpD7GhbzoRArJ8AJ9B830jqia/EaVv00p1HoJ/u5LSPACfZgTh Nd63fXreCFqnA+upC6iDXpw= =YAON -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chema Ollés wrote:
Hi all: I check this page -> http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/freshrpms/index.html and for suse 10.1 x86_32 I see a lot of files like this: FA_clxclient-debuginfo-1.0.2-4.x86_64.rpm ^^^^^^ is it normal?
No. Just corrected (will need some hours). Obviosly i must not escape | in reject rules... Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:48 +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chema Ollés wrote:
Hi all: I check this page -> http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/freshrpms/index.html and for suse 10.1 x86_32 I see a lot of files like this: FA_clxclient-debuginfo-1.0.2-4.x86_64.rpm
Just wondering, Fedora users seem to have problems when running apt-rpm on multi-architecture repositories. I've been told that multi-architecture is necessary for 64-bit systems for compat libraries for some apps. Is SUSE having more success in this area? Thanks, Mike
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 07:12 -0700, MJang wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:48 +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chema Ollés wrote:
Hi all: I check this page -> http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/freshrpms/index.html and for suse 10.1 x86_32 I see a lot of files like this: FA_clxclient-debuginfo-1.0.2-4.x86_64.rpm
Just wondering, Fedora users seem to have problems when running apt-rpm on multi-architecture repositories. I've been told that multi-architecture is necessary for 64-bit systems for compat libraries for some apps.
Is SUSE having more success in this area?
Just a little more info, per http://lwn.net/Articles/128952/ , for the reasons cited, Lineox (RHEL 4 rebuild distro) uses apt, but not for their x86_64 edition. If SUSE developers have solved this problem, great! Thanks, Mike
Hi, On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, MJang wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 07:12 -0700, MJang wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:48 +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chema Ollés wrote:
Hi all: I check this page -> http://linux01.gwdg.de/apt4rpm/freshrpms/index.html and for suse 10.1 x86_32 I see a lot of files like this: FA_clxclient-debuginfo-1.0.2-4.x86_64.rpm
Just wondering, Fedora users seem to have problems when running apt-rpm on multi-architecture repositories. I've been told that multi-architecture is necessary for 64-bit systems for compat libraries for some apps.
Is SUSE having more success in this area?
Just a little more info, per http://lwn.net/Articles/128952/ , for the reasons cited, Lineox (RHEL 4 rebuild distro) uses apt, but not for their x86_64 edition.
"this is because apt does not work well with systems that contain a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit applications and libraries"
If SUSE developers have solved this problem, great!
Not fully... The x88_64 repositories contain all the ix86 packages too. I can't do a qualified selection at the server side, so it is up to the user's side to deselect ix86 packages "where not necessary"... Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
participants (3)
-
Chema Ollés -
Eberhard Moenkeberg -
MJang