[opensuse] 10.2 Font Quality Backsliding from RC1 -> GM
Hi, If I liked it better the way it was in RC1, how do I get it back? What changed? Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006/12/09 12:21 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
If I liked it better the way it was in RC1,
I already wrote about this here twice in less than 24 hours. :-p Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-) Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
how do I get it back? What changed?
Probably most of us want to know. Maybe with a couple dozen threads on the subject somebody with a solution may show up to share it. -- "Let your conversation be always full of grace." Colossians 4:6 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 09 December 2006 12:34, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/09 12:21 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
If I liked it better the way it was in RC1,
I already wrote about this here twice in less than 24 hours. :-p
I'm not seeing it. Could you tell me the Subject: header of the messages you're referring to?
Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-)
Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
This has nothing to do with GTK / Gnome, I'm seeing it just in the basic KDE components such as the toolbar, Konsole, the Control Center, etc. Wait a minute... Are YaST's components KDE / Qt or Gnome / GKT programs? They seem to also show the degradation. I suppose I could try to describe the changes I'm seeing. It appears that the basic letterforms are lighter in weight but the anti-aliasing is stronger. I suspect (but am not certain / do not know for a fact) that this is the result of anti-aliasing taking the place of proper hinting. In all my experience getting fonts under Linux just the way I like them, the hint interpreter is superior.
how do I get it back? What changed?
Probably most of us want to know. Maybe with a couple dozen threads on the subject somebody with a solution may show up to share it.
Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 09 December 2006 22:15, Randall R Schulz wrote:
I suppose I could try to describe the changes I'm seeing. It appears that the basic letterforms are lighter in weight but the anti-aliasing is stronger. I suspect (but am not certain / do not know for a fact) that this is the result of anti-aliasing taking the place of proper hinting. In all my experience getting fonts under Linux just the way I like them, the hint interpreter is superior.
how do I get it back? What changed?
Thank you Randall you just pointed me in the right direction, Control Center-> Appearance & Themes-> Fonts-> Use anti-aliasing for fonts push the configure button-> enable Use sub-pixel hinting and for me Hinting style to Medium and my fonts are back to where they were with 10.1 Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Le samedi 9 décembre 2006 13:47, Michael Ayers a écrit :
Control Center-> Appearance & Themes-> Fonts-> Use anti-aliasing for fonts push the configure button-> enable Use sub-pixel hinting and for me Hinting style to Medium and my fonts are back to where they were with 10.1
That is just strange. Subpixel hinting has been switched off for openSUSE 10.2 at compile time, so there should be now way whatsoever to activate it at runtime. And it can not be the reason for different font rendering in 10.2RC1 and 10.2GM, because subpixel hinting was off in both versions. Well, I'm off to install 10.2 and see for myself :) -- Gruß Andreas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 10 December 2006 01:02, Andreas wrote:
Le samedi 9 décembre 2006 13:47, Michael Ayers a écrit :
Control Center-> Appearance & Themes-> Fonts-> Use anti-aliasing for fonts push the configure button-> enable Use sub-pixel hinting and for me Hinting style to Medium and my fonts are back to where they were with 10.1
That is just strange. Subpixel hinting has been switched off for openSUSE 10.2 at compile time, so there should be now way whatsoever to activate it at runtime.
And it can not be the reason for different font rendering in 10.2RC1 and 10.2GM, because subpixel hinting was off in both versions.
Well, I'm off to install 10.2 and see for myself :)
-- Gruß Andreas
You are right, I just turned subpixel hinting off but left hinting style on medium and the fonts are still okay. Probably something to to do with hinting style? Mike -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006/12/09 13:15 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
On Saturday 09 December 2006 12:34, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/09 12:21 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
If I liked it better the way it was in RC1,
I already wrote about this here twice in less than 24 hours. :-p
I'm not seeing it. Could you tell me the Subject: header of the messages you're referring to?
http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse/2006-12/msg01124.html http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse/2006-12/msg01220.html
Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-)
Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
This has nothing to do with GTK / Gnome, I'm seeing it just in the basic KDE components such as the toolbar, Konsole, the Control Center, etc.
Wait a minute... Are YaST's components KDE / Qt or Gnome / GKT programs? They seem to also show the degradation.
I suppose I could try to describe the changes I'm seeing. It appears that the basic letterforms are lighter in weight but the anti-aliasing is stronger. I suspect (but am not certain / do not know for a fact) that this is the result of anti-aliasing taking the place of proper hinting. In all my experience getting fonts under Linux just the way I like them, the hint interpreter is superior.
how do I get it back? What changed?
Probably most of us want to know. Maybe with a couple dozen threads on the subject somebody with a solution may show up to share it.
I filed a bug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227498 If the hinting default was set to something other than full this might not have been noticed by anyone understanding enough to file a bug about it. -- "Let your conversation be always full of grace." Colossians 4:6 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 12/9/06, Felix Miata
Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-)
Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
I'm not trying to be a smart-ass, but ... what's the difference? I really can see no difference between the font representations in either image .... I mean, there appears to be some variability, but I'm not sure what might be just poor png image quality and what is an actual diff between the fonts. If you could describe what you see as the difference perhaps it would help interpret the images. Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006-12-09 15:21, Peter Van Lone wrote:
On 12/9/06, Felix Miata
wrote: Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-)
Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
I'm not trying to be a smart-ass, but ... what's the difference? I
Look at the menu bar, in particular. -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s² -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Peter, On Saturday 09 December 2006 13:21, Peter Van Lone wrote:
On 12/9/06, Felix Miata
wrote: Installed and updated from factory only: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102f.png :-)
Installation from final released 10.2 DVD: http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/qt-gtk-fonts102r.png :-(
I'm not trying to be a smart-ass, but ... what's the difference? I really can see no difference between the font representations in either image .... I mean, there appears to be some variability, but I'm not sure what might be just poor png image quality and what is an actual diff between the fonts.
Are you kidding? It's huge! I guess if you just crank up the font sizes to ensure legibility, none of this stuff matters, but I'm firmly in the "there's no such thing as enough screen real estate" camp, so I need to minimize font sizes to enable maximum amount of information display.
If you could describe what you see as the difference perhaps it would help interpret the images.
Look at the Mozilla menu and toolbars in each of those screen shots. The difference is clear
Peter
Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006-12-09 15:42, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Peter,
On Saturday 09 December 2006 13:21, Peter Van Lone wrote:
<snip>
Are you kidding? It's huge!
He only looked at the title bars :-) -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s² -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Andreas
-
Darryl Gregorash
-
Felix Miata
-
Michael Ayers
-
Peter Van Lone
-
Randall R Schulz