Does anyone know the correct settings in sax2 for this monitor? I found a similar Dell at: http://binny.dyndns.org/xslt/dell.xml and tried the 1680x1050 setting. It seems to work fine, but I don't want to damage my display if it's wrong. I can't seem to find much on this model. 9.0 BTW -- Jim Sabatke Hire Me!! - See my resume at http://my.execpc.com/~jsabatke Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup. NOTE: Please do not email me any attachments with Microsoft extensions. They are deleted on my ISP's server before I ever see them, and no bounce message is sent.
On Sunday August 22 2004 11:07 pm, Jim Sabatke wrote:
Does anyone know the correct settings in sax2 for this monitor? I found a similar Dell at:
http://binny.dyndns.org/xslt/dell.xml
and tried the 1680x1050 setting. It seems to work fine, but I don't want to damage my display if it's wrong.
I can't seem to find much on this model.
Dell tech. support, IF you can get into Austin, NOT India, will give you the refresh rates for that monitor.......IF you insist FIRMLY. Fred -- "Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on."
Jim, On Sunday 22 August 2004 20:07, Jim Sabatke wrote:
Does anyone know the correct settings in sax2 for this monitor? I found a similar Dell at:
http://binny.dyndns.org/xslt/dell.xml
and tried the 1680x1050 setting. It seems to work fine, but I don't want to damage my display if it's wrong.
Is it not the case that modern monitors will not allow themselves to be driven beyond their rated sync rates? In other words, if you get an image, then the sync rates you've chosen are acceptable to the monitor. Please, someone, correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe that's why my ten-ton Apple Studio monitor gave out prematurely...
I can't seem to find much on this model.
9.0 BTW
-- Jim Sabatke
Randall Schulz
On Sunday August 22 2004 11:50 pm, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Jim,
On Sunday 22 August 2004 20:07, Jim Sabatke wrote:
Does anyone know the correct settings in sax2 for this monitor? I found a similar Dell at:
http://binny.dyndns.org/xslt/dell.xml
and tried the 1680x1050 setting. It seems to work fine, but I don't want to damage my display if it's wrong.
Is it not the case that modern monitors will not allow themselves to be driven beyond their rated sync rates? In other words, if you get an image, then the sync rates you've chosen are acceptable to the monitor.
Please, someone, correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe that's why my ten-ton Apple Studio monitor gave out prematurely.
There are SOME monitors that are supposed to have some protection in them, but as far as I know, MOST don't. Further, you can be sure than Dell monitors don't........made as cheaply as possible. The problem is, that Dell and many others don't publish the refresh rates in their "owner manuals," if you can call them that......incomplete and VERY POORLY written. So, the only option one has is to call tech. support and be very insistant that you find out EXACTLY the refresh rates for that monitor, then write them down. Fred -- "Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on."
On Sunday 22 August 2004 8:07 pm, Jim Sabatke wrote:
Does anyone know the correct settings in sax2 for this monitor? I found a similar Dell at:
http://binny.dyndns.org/xslt/dell.xml
and tried the 1680x1050 setting. It seems to work fine, but I don't want to damage my display if it's wrong.
I can't seem to find much on this model.
9.0 BTW
-- Jim Sabatke Jim,
All 17" 4x3 LCDs should work at 1280x1024 @ 60Hz, which is their native resolution. I think you can use the LCD feature in Sax or VESA feature. The 17" LCDs we make here we can run at 1600x1200, but it doesn't look really good. -- Tom Nielsen Neuro Logic Systems, Inc. 1.805.389.5435 x18 www.neuro-logic.com
participants (4)
-
Fred Miller
-
Jim Sabatke
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Tom Nielsen