Looking for a FTP Program that is able to run Implicit SSL on Gnome suse 10.0 Is there one? Regards /Per
Thanks, installed gftp with apt-get.....will try it later today.
/Per
On 5/17/06, Francesco Teodori
Try gft.
Francesco
Per Kustemo wrote:
Looking for a FTP Program that is able to run Implicit SSL on Gnome suse 10.0 Is there one? Regards /Per
Which browser works with the 64 bit version of the mplayer plugin?
On 5/17/06, kanenas@hawaii.rr.com wrote:
Which browser works with the 64 bit version of the mplayer plugin?
64 bit firefox works OK for me on 10.0. The real problem is, that you can not have flash player (there is only 32 bit) and some of the codecs (win32 codecs) will not work. -- -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:48, Sunny wrote:
On 5/17/06, kanenas@hawaii.rr.com wrote:
Which browser works with the 64 bit version of the mplayer plugin?
64 bit firefox works OK for me on 10.0. The real problem is, that you can not have flash player (there is only 32 bit) and some of the codecs (win32 codecs) will not work.
Upgrade to 10.1 and you will find there are 64bit version of realplayer and java jre. If you obtain the source RPM for w32codecs from packman.links2linux.de, and just compile this, no files need editing, you will have a 64bit w32codes rpm you can install. Davids -- david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864
On 5/17/06, David Bottrill wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:48, Sunny wrote:
On 5/17/06, wrote:
Which browser works with the 64 bit version of the mplayer plugin?
64 bit firefox works OK for me on 10.0. The real problem is, that you can not have flash player (there is only 32 bit) and some of the codecs (win32 codecs) will not work.
Upgrade to 10.1 and you will find there are 64bit version of realplayer and java jre. If you obtain the source RPM for w32codecs from packman.links2linux.de, and just compile this, no files need editing, you will have a 64bit w32codes rpm you can install.
Davids
Thanks for the info. Can you confirm that w32codecs compiled that way do support windows media files? -- -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 15:50, Sunny wrote:
Thanks for the info. Can you confirm that w32codecs compiled that way do support windows media files?
Yes, but but WMV V9 isn't yet supported by w32codes AFAIK. -- david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864
On 5/17/06, David Bottrill wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 14:48, Sunny wrote:
On 5/17/06, wrote:
Which browser works with the 64 bit version of the mplayer plugin?
64 bit firefox works OK for me on 10.0. The real problem is, that you can not have flash player (there is only 32 bit) and some of the codecs (win32 codecs) will not work.
Upgrade to 10.1 and you will find there are 64bit version of realplayer and java jre. If you obtain the source RPM for w32codecs from packman.links2linux.de, and just compile this, no files need editing, you will have a 64bit w32codes rpm you can install.
DavidsSearch
Thanks for the info. Can you confirm that w32codecs compiled that way do support windows media files? so it is only 64bit firefox that can use the plugin! thanks!, also, thanks for
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 04:50, Sunny wrote: the compile suggestion. now to verify how the source rpm compile goes: as a REGULAR user run: rpm --rebuild -bb foo.src.rpm, which creates an rpm in /usr/src/packages/rpms/ which must be installed by yast, correct? but i am a little scared about running 10.1 yet, there seem to be issues with vmware and i need that to run flawlesly. is there a reason why the same recompile can not be done in suse 10.0? but then how can the flash plugin work in either 10.0 or 10.1? is there a source code/rpm for flash?
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:32, kanenas@hawaii.rr.com wrote:
so it is only 64bit firefox that can use the plugin! thanks!, also, thanks for the compile suggestion. now to verify how the source rpm compile goes: as a REGULAR user run: rpm --rebuild -bb foo.src.rpm, which creates an rpm
This created a X86_64 RPM for me.
in /usr/src/packages/rpms/ which must be installed by yast,
I just use rpm -Uvh then run SuSEconfig
correct? but i am a little scared about running 10.1 yet, there seem to be issues with vmware and i need that to run flawlesly. is there a reason why the same recompile can not be done in suse 10.0? but then how can the flash plugin work in either 10.0 or 10.1? is there a source code/rpm for flash?
I've got VMware running without any problems and there is a work-around for USB devices that seems to be the only problem. I found that with VMware running on 10.0 the whole machine would freeze for short periods or at least become very sluggish. With 10.1 VMware behaves far better, so unless you have a need to use USB devices with VMware then it works fine. I did use the VMware any-any update. If you want to run Linux virtual machines then Xen works very nicely under 10.1. David -- david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 11:55, David Bottrill wrote:
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:32, kanenas@hawaii.rr.com wrote:
so it is only 64bit firefox that can use the plugin! thanks!, also, thanks for the compile suggestion. now to verify how the source rpm compile goes: as a REGULAR user run: rpm --rebuild -bb foo.src.rpm, which creates an rpm
This created a X86_64 RPM for me.
in /usr/src/packages/rpms/ which must be installed by yast,
I just use rpm -Uvh then run SuSEconfig
correct? but i am a little scared about running 10.1 yet, there seem to be issues with vmware and i need that to run flawlesly. is there a reason why the same recompile can not be done in suse 10.0? but then how can the flash plugin work in either 10.0 or 10.1? is there a source code/rpm for flash?
I've got VMware running without any problems and there is a work-around for USB devices that seems to be the only problem. I found that with VMware running on 10.0 the whole machine would freeze for short periods or at least become very sluggish. With 10.1 VMware behaves far better, so unless you have a need to use USB devices with VMware then it works fine. I did use the VMware any-any update. If you want to run Linux virtual machines then Xen works very nicely under 10.1.
David
-- david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864 Thanks David for the info.
But what about flash? Re vmware, my printer is an hp7350 and often a print job gets messed up in cups, it just stops in the middle of the task. This is more prevalent with vm virtual machines, so my workaround has been to access the printer as a native printer thru the usb port, so the usb port or an updated driver is needed for me. dimitris
On Thursday 18 May 2006 01:00, kanenas@hawaii.rr.com wrote:
But what about flash?
I hadn't tried flash so I've just been to the Macromedia (Adobe) website and guess what it works.
Re vmware, my printer is an hp7350 and often a print job gets messed up in cups, it just stops in the middle of the task. This is more prevalent with vm virtual machines, so my workaround has been to access the printer as a native printer thru the usb port, so the usb port or an updated driver is needed for me.
I reckon the fix someone posted the other day sounds likely to get USB on Mware working. -- David Bottrill david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864
participants (5)
-
David Bottrill -
Francesco Teodori -
kanenas＠hawaii.rr.com -
Per Kustemo -
Sunny