From reading through the headers on this list, I can tell I'm not the only one looking at streams of obscure abort messages. After paying a not insignificant amount for the VMWare program and running it on
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o. This is getting silly. I depend on VMWare to run some Windows programs with no Linux substitutes. For now, I'm running it only on one of my laptops with 8.2 installed. This is a royal pain. previous versions of SUSE, I'm not in much mood to return to dual-booting or keeping a dedicated Windows box. Is there light at the end of this tunnel?
On Dilluns 12 Gener 2004 06:37, Tim Hanson wrote:
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o.
What's exactly your problem with VMware4? I have it running now... Just lauch that vmware-config.pl (as root) and let it compile the vmmon.o What's the error output of that?
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 00:37, Tim Hanson wrote:
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o.
This is getting silly. I depend on VMWare to run some Windows programs with no Linux substitutes. For now, I'm running it only on one of my laptops with 8.2 installed. This is a royal pain.
This is a royal pain. A previous poster gave this suggestion which worked for my desktop and laptop. install the -144 kernel (no need to reboot) copy the vm* modules someplace safe install the -166 kernel copy the vm* modules to the misc directory if the not-configured file exists in /etc/vmware delete it reboot and you should have a running vmware. PS. good to have this list back after the open relay problem was fixed. -- Ken Schneider unix user since 1989 linux user since 1994 SuSE user since 1998 (5.2)
Hi, an alternative product that I have installed wuthout any problem on SuSE is Win4Lin. You can find some description on my Web site http://www.wisepenguin.com/index2_4.php The only limit of the product is that it supports only Windows 95, 98 and ME. Best Regards Mario Pesce At 07:17 AM 1/12/04 -0500, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 00:37, Tim Hanson wrote:
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o.
This is getting silly. I depend on VMWare to run some Windows programs with no Linux substitutes. For now, I'm running it only on one of my laptops with 8.2 installed. This is a royal pain.
This is a royal pain.
A previous poster gave this suggestion which worked for my desktop and laptop.
install the -144 kernel (no need to reboot)
copy the vm* modules someplace safe
install the -166 kernel
copy the vm* modules to the misc directory
if the not-configured file exists in /etc/vmware delete it
reboot and you should have a running vmware.
PS. good to have this list back after the open relay problem was fixed.
-- Ken Schneider unix user since 1989 linux user since 1994 SuSE user since 1998 (5.2)
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Do you like Win4Lin? I currently run CrossoverOffice.. I was wondering which people feel is better... --Charles On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 07:59, Mario Pesce wrote:
Hi,
an alternative product that I have installed wuthout any problem on SuSE is Win4Lin.
You can find some description on my Web site http://www.wisepenguin.com/index2_4.php
The only limit of the product is that it supports only Windows 95, 98 and ME.
Best Regards
Mario Pesce
At 07:17 AM 1/12/04 -0500, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 00:37, Tim Hanson wrote:
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o.
This is getting silly. I depend on VMWare to run some Windows programs with no Linux substitutes. For now, I'm running it only on one of my laptops with 8.2 installed. This is a royal pain.
This is a royal pain.
A previous poster gave this suggestion which worked for my desktop and laptop.
install the -144 kernel (no need to reboot)
copy the vm* modules someplace safe
install the -166 kernel
copy the vm* modules to the misc directory
if the not-configured file exists in /etc/vmware delete it
reboot and you should have a running vmware.
PS. good to have this list back after the open relay problem was fixed.
-- Ken Schneider unix user since 1989 linux user since 1994 SuSE user since 1998 (5.2)
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Do you like Win4Lin? I currently run CrossoverOffice.. I was wondering which people feel is better... That depends on your personal needs: When using WINE and CrossoverOffice, you are running the Windows applications on Linux as if they were native Linux apps. The apps think
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:12:49 -0500
Charles
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:12, Jerry Feldman wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:12:49 -0500 Charles
wrote: Do you like Win4Lin? I currently run CrossoverOffice.. I was wondering which people feel is better... That depends on your personal needs: When using WINE and CrossoverOffice, you are running the Windows applications on Linux as if they were native Linux apps. The apps think they are running under Windows. Unfortunately, not all Windows apps work under WINE of cxoffice. In general, WINE's window directories are normally allocated in your home directory (or any other Linux native directory tree).
Win4Lin is a virtual machine that runs under Linux. Under Win4Lin you are running a full blown copy of Windows 9x. The advantage is that Win4Lin can run nearly all Windows9x apps. However, you will take a performance hit. In general, Win4Lin's files are allocated similar to WINE, so you can easily access the files from Linux. Win4Lin costs a bit more than CrossoverOffice.
VMWare is a full blown virtual machine system, and can run many different operating systems concurrently, such as Windows 2000, Windows 9x, Linux, FreeBSD. Other than the cost and performance issues, VMWare encapsulates each OS, such that they do not share any disk space. VMWare is expensive.
- -- Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAAqsx+wA+1cUGHqkRAh61AKCGxi5rCbZckUuXSJr1LkEjMs59LwCeKquP 7i4PdoKHDwZDSGY8JL+mTJs= =pTvH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ohhh Ok.. :) I wasnt completely sure what it was.. :) The site is a bit odd in the way they talk about it.. Thanks for clearing it up for me... --Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 12 January 2004 06:12 am, Jerry Feldman wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:12:49 -0500
Charles
wrote: Do you like Win4Lin? I currently run CrossoverOffice.. I was wondering which people feel is better...
That depends on your personal needs: When using WINE and CrossoverOffice, you are running the Windows applications on Linux as if they were native Linux apps. The apps think they are running under Windows. Unfortunately, not all Windows apps work under WINE of cxoffice. In general, WINE's window directories are normally allocated in your home directory (or any other Linux native directory tree).
Win4Lin is a virtual machine that runs under Linux. Under Win4Lin you are running a full blown copy of Windows 9x. The advantage is that Win4Lin can run nearly all Windows9x apps. However, you will take a performance hit.
I've not seen much of a performance hit at all, graphics are not always as fast as native win98 but generally acceptable. I can start a win4lin winders 98 session followed by word 2000 faster than word 2000 alone launches under crossover office. Win4Lins weakness is that they are still not fully directx capable (some games work, some don't) and sound input is not available though output works fine. Some of my daughters games don't work and I think that may be related to some cd protection scheme but I haven't really worked that hard to find out.
In general, Win4Lin's files are allocated similar to WINE, so you can easily access the files from Linux. Win4Lin costs a bit more than CrossoverOffice.
And you need to do a win install on your linux filesystem (ie you need a win98 install cd). Installation works much better and faster (about 10 minutes for me) under win4lin than it does on fresh hardware. If you want kernel updates (security etc) then you have to update the kernel through win4lin. So far crossover hasn't been affected by any kernel changes I've made, so a little less maintenence there.
VMWare is a full blown virtual machine system, and can run many different operating systems concurrently, such as Windows 2000, Windows 9x, Linux, FreeBSD. Other than the cost and performance issues, VMWare encapsulates each OS, such that they do not share any disk space. VMWare is expensive.
I've found both crossover office and win4lin customer support to be excellent, If I could only choose 1 product I would go with win4lin. See ya - -- dh Don't shop at GoogleGear.com! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAAsHDBwgxlylUsJARAiDYAJ9bOeWMeBNeGHt+01zPtgKrtPgE7QCdH+z6 Evl8ZYMNDcKLmnqkqrkpxwM= =nkI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 06:12, Jerry Feldman wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:12:49 -0500 Charles
wrote: Do you like Win4Lin? I currently run CrossoverOffice.. I was wondering which people feel is better... That depends on your personal needs: When using WINE and CrossoverOffice, you are running the Windows applications on Linux as if they were native Linux apps. The apps think they are running under Windows. Unfortunately, not all Windows apps work under WINE of cxoffice. In general, WINE's window directories are normally allocated in your home directory (or any other Linux native directory tree).
Win4Lin is a virtual machine that runs under Linux. Under Win4Lin you are running a full blown copy of Windows 9x. The advantage is that Win4Lin can run nearly all Windows9x apps. However, you will take a performance hit. In general, Win4Lin's files are allocated similar to WINE, so you can easily access the files from Linux. Win4Lin costs a bit more than CrossoverOffice.
VMWare is a full blown virtual machine system, and can run many different operating systems concurrently, such as Windows 2000, Windows 9x, Linux, FreeBSD. Other than the cost and performance issues, VMWare encapsulates each OS, such that they do not share any disk space. VMWare is expensive.
VMware is pretty nice, or at least it was until I installed 9.0. I estimate that it runs Windows around 2/3 as fast as it would on real hardware. For me, using Win2K on a 2.3ghz laptop runs about as fast as this version of Windows was intended to run. Any slowness isn't noticed. The only annoyance on a laptop is that one must boot two operating systems to use a Windows app. It doesn't matter so much on a desktop, since VM can be minimized, parked out of the way, and be available for months at a time. On a laptop with frequent boots and a battery draining every minute, it can get long. VM takes a chunk out of memory and keeps it as long as the virtual machine is running. For my installation of W2K it grabs 176mb. My laptop has 512mb of memory so this doesn't slow things down, but it pays to be aware of the constraints. The final catch is that it costs better than $300. It has been worth it until now. Hopefully I can get it running on the desktop again.
Please DO NOT reply to the list and the poster. The poster is on the list and therefore recieves a copy. If you must do a reply-to-all because you don't know how to do a reply-to-list delete posters email address. On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 07:59, Mario Pesce wrote:
Hi,
an alternative product that I have installed wuthout any problem on SuSE is Win4Lin.
Win4Lin is -not- an option here as I need to run 2000. -- Ken Schneider unix user since 1989 linux user since 1994 SuSE user since 1998 (5.2)
Tim Hanson wrote:
I certainly wish SUSE and VMWare would get together and solve the problems getting them to work together. I have followed all the instructions both on the SUSE db and and the VMWare troubleshooting site, and I can't VMWare 4 to run on SUSE. The latest attempt ended with vmware-config.pl aborting when I followed the SUSE advice on vmmon.o.
This is getting silly. I depend on VMWare to run some Windows programs with no Linux substitutes. For now, I'm running it only on one of my laptops with 8.2 installed. This is a royal pain.
From reading through the headers on this list, I can tell I'm not the only one looking at streams of obscure abort messages. After paying a not insignificant amount for the VMWare program and running it on previous versions of SUSE, I'm not in much mood to return to dual-booting or keeping a dedicated Windows box.
Is there light at the end of this tunnel?
The default module in vmware segfaulted when I ran it, I don't know if that was your problem, but here's what worked for me: install the kernel-source rpm and prepare it with "make cloneconfig" and "make dep", then install the km_vmware package, cd to /usr/src/kernel-modules/vmware/ and compile it with "make -f Makefile.module" and "make install".
participants (8)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Charles
-
David Herman
-
Ivanovich
-
Jerry Feldman
-
Kenneth Schneider
-
Mario Pesce
-
Tim Hanson