21 Jan
2004
21 Jan
'04
23:09
Charles Philip Chan wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:50:58 -0600 Jim Sabatke
wrote: It is inconvenient.
It is not our fault that you chose to use an email program without a "reply to mailinglist" function.
Perhaps I'm wrong in this, but I got the impression that list was to disseminate info about SuSE. Given that most of the discussion is of interest to many, why make the more commonly used funtion the one that's less likely to come naturally to most users? And no, many mail programs do not support reply to list. Are we supposed to change our software to suit the one list that does things backward? On every list I've ever used, replying only to the person is uncommon.