2013. május 28. 6:18 napon Andrey Borzenkov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
В Tue, 28 May 2013 05:04:42 +0200 "Carlos E. R."
пишет: The problem is that in 12.1 /media was a tmpfs, and in 12.3 it is not. Why?
Is this an intentional change, or is it a slip and should we create "/media" ourselves as a tmpfs (and how), and create a bugreport about it?
commit 231931ffba1bca9d8759bbd6f797e56f8c6971fa Author: Lennart Poettering
Date: Tue Mar 27 17:04:22 2012 +0200 units: don't mount tmpfs on /media anymore
udisks2 doesn't use /media anymore, instead mounts removable media in a user-private directory beneath /run. /media is hence mostly obsolete and hence it makes little sense to continue to mount a tmpfs to it.
Distributions should consider dropping the mount point entirely since nothing uses it anymore.
Hello: I confess I have no idea what udisks2 is, and the latest version of openSUSE I have is 12.1. I also use 11.2 on other machines. My goal is to be able to use my SUSE computer in the same way as I used it in the last ten years . Changes like these seems for me arbitrary and unnecessary. In 12.1 /media is a tmpfs. That means I can not create my floppy directory in it like in previous versions. Then I read here that in newer versions removable media is not mounted in media but some other /run/? directories. Why is that good? Who prefers to navigate to some ../../../../ directory instead of /media? And as I understand correctly the media mounted by user A can't be read by user B. On a desktop. Why? That is if I mount a CD and switch user, that user can not read the CD? Do we really want this nonsense? So to the list of KDE4, gnome3, and systemd is added this nice 'feature' as well. I start to think that it would be more benefit for linux if those developers of todays did not do programing. Istvan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org