Mitch Thompson
On Friday 21 March 2003 02:39, John Pettigrew wrote:
Perhaps you could sign messages using PGP/MIME for those who support it - it would then not annoy people reading the text part because it would be in a separate part?
I will look into it, especially if it will promote peace and harmony here.
FWIW, my Mutt setup doesn't show your sig (which is normal). The message looks like: ========================================================================== [-- BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE --] On Friday 21 March 2003 02:39, John Pettigrew wrote:
Perhaps you could sign messages using PGP/MIME for those who support it -
[...] "There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't." [-- END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE --] ========================================================================= Apparently, the reason it looks as it should is because my .procmailrc inserts the proper headers: =====================> .promailrc <========================= [...] ## PGP ## :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp { :0 fBwh * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt" :0 fBwh * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign" } [...] =========================================================== However, PGP 6.58 fails to verify your sig. Anyone been able to get a good sig report on Mitch's sigs? (yes, Mitch's public key is on my keyring). I second John's suggestion to sign messages using PGP/MIME. Sigs that don't verify are not of much use. -rex -- Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you." -- George Orwell, 1984