On Monday 23 January 2006 15:50, Randall R Schulz wrote:
T.,
On Monday 23 January 2006 07:44, T. Ribbrock wrote:
...
How does your accusation of overgeneralization equate to hypocrisy?
Well, on the one hand going on about "Humanity will not be free [under certain circumstances]", thus clearly advocating humanity/freedom (which is a noble thing to do), yet using sweeping statements and failing to recognise the individual differences just doesn't chime for me. Did I misinterpret you?
I don't know, but deistic religions are an immense drag on human progress, and an impediment to justice and freedom, and have been throughout our history and probably our prehistory as well. It is eminently reasonable to conclude that they will continue to be so in the future.
I have not been hypocritical.
... Cheerio,
Thomas
RRS
When man does away with religon completely we may get somewhere in the universe instead of bieng crippled by some rather sad idealism that ther is a higher/ superior power out there that made everything item it'sa all a load of cobblers and the other thing that isd also cobblers is the idea that we are the only inteligent life that exists period whoever believs that one need shootinh now . Pete . -- The Labour party has changed there emblem from a rose to a condom as it more accuratley reflects the governments political stance. A condom allows for inflation halts production destroys the next gereration, protects a bunch of pricks, and givesyou a sense of security while you are actually bieng fucked from GSM