Peter B Van Campen wrote:
On Thursday 04 August 2005 14:16, James Knott wrote:
The bottom line is that Darl McBride and company are not only ruining the former Caldera, but doing their best to hurt the entire Unix/Linux marketplace, which might be their objective. I wonder what their lawyers think about the Novell suit, particularly regarding McBride trying to get the copyrights from Novell and also about that software engineer's memo? Did they know about them or were
Jerry Feldman wrote: they surprised?
Hi,
Well the SCOG lawyers DID demand payment in ADVANCE!
PeterB
p.s. remember that the now NONsecret ATT-Berkeley agreement strongly suggests that traditional UNIX code has been PUBLIC DOMAIN for many years now, and that consequently these suits are MOOT
My question is what happens, should the lawyers find out that the client has lied? That there really is no case? Somehow, I don't get the impression that David Boies would proceed with a case he knows to be fraudulent.