On Monday 07 September 2009 05:38:21 am James Knott wrote:
JB2 wrote:
On 04 September 09, Bob S wrote:
Don't let me down now here folks. Sven Burmeister says that KDE3 was broken. Regardless of whether you use KDE3 or KDE4, let's vote on the issue.
If I am wrong I will forever keep my mouth shut.
I vote NO it was not broken.
KDE3 is *NOT* broken. I also vote NO.
It works fine for me too.
I use 11.1 in kde3 and have been successful installing 11.2 with gnome. every effort i have made with kde4 failed miserably within the first hour when i was lucky enough to complete an install, so i simply gave up on it. Initially i was thrilled with the " start from scratch" approach, alas, there was a very stupid decision taken at the very beginning: someone or some group decided that they were going to shove it down our throats the way they felt was the correct way, with the features that they decided would be good for us, on a time schedule that had nothing to do with quality control, because he/she/it/ they KNEW BEST.... if i wanted that, i would have windows. (xp and i hear 7 are quite stable...) as it stands, i will wait until something around kde 4.5 as the brave new numbering system goes; by then it should stop being a case of too much lipstick on a pig and some of the "from scratch" effort would have actually been spent on functionality... d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org