14 Feb
2005
14 Feb
'05
20:07
The Monday 2005-02-14 at 11:33 -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote:
That seems rather poor program design to me. I should have thought a better approach would be for xinetd not to make that particular service available and to start with the validly configured services, rather than just giving up altogether.
And leave you thinking that everything was fine even though a (maybe) important process wasn't working??? That's not the way I want it...
On a headless machine, you could be left out, and be prevented from solving the problem reometely. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson