On 1/23/2012 4:03 PM, C wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 21:28, Brian K. White
wrote: On 1/22/2012 8:52 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Use btrfs and you can be comfortable you are using SSD-specific stuff even though it probably doesn't matter in any meaningful way.
Use btrfs and you can be comfortable you will lose everything once in a while.
I've been using btrfs since 12.1 came out.. .no problems. Well not 100% true. I did have to run the btrfs repair tool once... and after looking into what went wrong etc, I came to the conclusion it was my fault for poking around a little too much. After the repair, I left it alone... and no problems at all.
C.
Wow, that long? one pc since 12.1 came out? And only one problem that you were luck enough to recover from? In all those weeks and weeks of testing by all those 1 machines performing I'm guessing no exhaustive stress-test? You practically make my point merely by how little you counter it, if that were possible. A filesystem needs a lot more testing and proof of stability before you can recommend it to unsuspecting people to actually use. Making recommendations like this implies a certain amount of responsibility. Also, is https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ wrong? "Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix errors." -- bkw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org