On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:09 -0500, Regis Matejcik wrote:
make was all it took. I couldn't believe that gcc etc. would have been installed without installing make as well. Thanks.
-- Stan Goodman Qiryat Tiv'on Israel
Ya know, this is a good point. Just out of curiosity, does the default install of gcc not include make?
which brings the question, of what use is a compiler that doesn't have make?
They are separate packages. There is more than one variant on gnu make. And other make-like systems that can replace make, calling gcc as needed. In addition, make need not run gcc. I use make to build documentation and packages and even run Windows apps. So, make and gcc often work together. But that is only one use. For that reason, they are separate. -- Roger Oberholtzer OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST Ramböll Sverige AB Krukmakargatan 21 P.O. Box 17009 SE-104 62 Stockholm, Sweden Office: Int +46 10-615 60 20 Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org