![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/b12cfb65ca4faebc3e3aac17838e8f8d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
9 Oct
2005
9 Oct
'05
19:28
Per, On Sunday 09 October 2005 12:04, Per Jessen wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
There's nothing inherently more resource-consumptive about release 10 than 8.
Yes, there is. The rescue system takes more memory, as does the installation system itself. I have had to stop using the 10 rescue-system and either use Knoppix or the 9.0 rescue system. Installation-wise, 10 needs at least 96Mb RAM, whereas 8 was ok with 64M.
What is the "rescue system?" But I qualified my claim by saying it was for a comparable installation. If this rescue system thing is a major new function, then it would not count as a "comparable installation."
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Randall Schulz