28 Mar
2016
28 Mar
'16
17:28
On 03/27/2016 10:50 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
No, not true. There was FAT. I have seen more XP machines on FAT than on NTFS.
Don't forget ReFS Its sort of still NTFS underneath, But it seems like its a BTRFS wanna-be. -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.