On Sunday 14 October 2007 18:01:32 nordi wrote:
Anders Johansson schrieb:
Cool. Can you do the same thing for 10.3, so we can compare?
Here it is.
Syscalls run considerably slower in 10.3 than in 10.0. I grepped through the file to see how long the syscalls took:
10.0: 5 usecs: 52792 6 usecs: 79944 7 usecs: 434 weighted average: 5.61 usecs
10.3 5 usecs: 16811 6 usecs: 85497 7 usecs: 4282 weighted average: 5.88 usecs
That's only a 5% difference, but probably there are rounding errors hiding somewhere since we have very small numbers: If you go by the size of the files (6.0MB versus 7.5MB) the difference is much clearer.
I think the main difference here is in the time the execve() call takes. On 10.0 it's 0.000140 seconds, whereas on 10.3 it's 0.019752. That's 140 times slower, and it dwarves all the other times I wonder why that would be Anders -- Madness takes its toll -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org