On Tuesday 23 August 2005 22:39, Dylan wrote:
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2005 20:46, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 21:27, Dylan wrote:
You speak better English that a computer can ever analyse.
Would a computer have caught that, I wonder :)
Hey, we can all fall foul of typos and spelling mistakes. That's why everything should be read by a third party if it's of any consequence.
Thankfully, email is of little import so I couldn't give a f***.
It wasn't criticism, I know it was a typo. I was trying to make the point that that is exactly the kind of mistake a spelling checker wouldn't be able to catch (since it is in fact the correct spelling of 'that'), but a grammar checker would (or at least could) It's not perfect, and as you say it probably never can be, but it can be useful