17 Feb
2008
17 Feb
'08
18:21
On Sunday 17 February 2008 11:29:45 am James Knott wrote:
Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:28:13 -0500, James Knott wrote:
It's another area where Windows is behind the times.
Not really. NTFS is rather fragmentation resistent. It's only FAT and its decendants that lacks considerably.
Philipp
Then why does the defragmenter in XP show how fragmented NTFS partions are?
Fragmentation resistant doesn't mean fragmentation free. -- Regards, Rajko. See http://en.opensuse.org/Portal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org