-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Knott wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
The problem is that consumer level routers don't support IPv6, at least in routing & NAT functions.
NAT = evil; there is no NAT in IPv6. One of the advantages of a huge address space is that you can get rid of NAT.
Quite so. With IPv6, users are assigned a *HUGE* number of IP addresses, which can be used as desired.
The wiki article below seems to suggest that implementing a form of NAT for IPv6 is under discussion by the IETF... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6 Also suggests the implementation is not exactly consistent (or as simple as intended)... - -- ============================================================================== I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone. Bjarne Stroustrup ============================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrhc+oACgkQasN0sSnLmgLVigCfbyBDNqlI6/zlAGltMwBWg8HQ wDYAoIgMhjKjsddu4Ud9N0OfR0uLjzhU =WFNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org