On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 15:33 +1300, Michael Hamilton wrote:
On Fri, 08 Nov 2013, John Layt wrote:
On 7 November 2013 22:12, Hans Witvliet
wrote: ... B) keeping it for now is just postponing the inevitable .... Inconveniencing people now because it is inevitable that they will be inconvenienced later doesn't sound like a good policy. If a little effort can delay the pain for a while longer, then why not be helpful and do so? Or do we want to lose some users as soon as possible?
Hi Michael,
Certainly not !!
But i feel two different issue's (technical and non-technical should be
distinguished.
From a pure technical P.O.V., AR-9 is old, will not be maintained any
longer, and could become a security issue. So it is perfectly
understandable that "they" want to drop AR-9 as fast as possible.
Chances that AR-10 or AR-11 will get a maintained linux version are ...
slim <<<<