Rejaine Monteiro wrote:
(first at all, sorry by poor english... babel fish was used. Brazilians? Helps me with this please)
I had bad experiences with the combination reiserfs and SuSE 9.0
I'm running reiserfs, before with SuSE 8.1, 8.2 on several pc's. And now, with 9.0, we have many problems !!!
I change hdds and use hdds from different manufacturers.
If the pc's "crash" the errors "Give password to login" occours..
Partitions /home (/dev/hda5) is corrupted and reiserfsck --rebuild-tree is solicited.
I search in web about this problem e found similar questions, bu without solutions (they always think that we have a hardware problem, memory problems.. etc..)
Hardware problems? I do not believe (many pc's have same problems after upgrade) Reiserfs with Suse 8.2 had no problems. Only after upgrade this problem had become more frequent.
There is a known bug?
This is my configuration:
Suse 9.0 Kernel 2.4.21-243-default reiserfs-3.6.9-33
and reisersck (with lost data!!)
####### Pass 0 ####### 26696 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash. ####### Pass 1 ####### ####### Pass 2 ####### ####### Pass 3 ######### rebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [12411 19801] (".y2log") in directory [12410 12411] points to nowhere - is removed rebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [12411 17718] ("erros.tar") in directory [12410 12411] points to nowhere - is removed rebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [12411 13146] (".fonts.cache-1") in directory [12410 12411] points to nowhere - is removed vpf-10650: The directory [12410 12411] has the wrong size in the StatData (10936) - corrected to (10848) rebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [12410 17217] ("bkp20040914.tar.gz") in directory [17 12410] points to nowhere - is removed rebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [12410 17190] ("bkp20040915.tar.gz") in directory [17 12410] points to nowhere - is removed vpf-10650: The directory [17 12410] has the wrong size in the StatData (272) - corrected to (192) ####### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) #########
Hi Rejaine, Did you upgraded the system or re-formatted when moving from suse 8.x to 9.0? I also have a suse 9.0 system (clean install) with the same kernel, but my reiserfs package has a different number after the dash: reiserfs-3.6.9-37 I checked ftp.suse.com and this is it. I don't know why yours is different. Mistyped? May be there's a place where they list the changes from one version to another.... It would be nice. I had some unexpected power failures, and the server always went back without additional intervention... (of course there were replayed logs and etc) Perhaps your /etc/fstab is with wrong parameters... Mine have entries like this: /dev/hda2 / reiserfs defaults 1 1 /dev/hda3 /var reiserfs defaults 1 2 (...) [Se você tiver problemas com o Ingles, me escreva pessoalmente; talvez eu possa ajudar em algo] -- Marcos Lazarini