Hello,
In the Message;
Subject : [opensuse] Re: mail headers (was: Postfix + Cyrus IMAP + MySQL won't work :-()
Message-ID :
Date & Time: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:36:25 +0200
[Joachim] == Joachim Schrod has written:
Me>> Joachim, why do you always change the Message-Id in the In-Reply-To field
Me>> in your reply mail.
Me>> This breaks the thread!
Sorry for unsufficient explanation.
Joachim> Hmm, the thread is signified by the References header, not by the
Joachim> In-Reply-To header. See RFC 2822, section 3.6.4.
I know.
Of cource, my MUA (=Wanderlust) always see References field.
By encountering Thread's break, I changes setteings as follows;
(setq elmo-msgdb-prefer-in-reply-to-for-parent t)
This is to caorrect thread easier.
Joachim> My In-Reply-To header is different because I don't follow the mailing
Joachim> list directly, but use the news gateway at nntp://news.gmane.org/. The
Joachim> posting that I reply to has the changed message header which gets
Joachim> copied to In-Reply-To. The thread's message ids itself are correctly
Joachim> listed in the References header.
Don't you know?
Your MUA changed Message-ID in the Reference field, too!
Like this;
Original Message-ID is Pine.LNX.4.64.0704231349090.20538@nimrodel.valinor
In your mail;
References:
[...]
In-Reply-To:
Is this reasonable with respect to RFC?
Joachim> Well, at least Pine, Thunderbird, Seamonkey, GNUS, Emacs VM, handle it
Joachim> as intended.
Surprised! But how?
Do these MUAs see Reference field?
I don't think so.
Regards,
---
Masaru Nomiya mail-to: nomiya @ galaxy.dti.ne.jp
"Bill! You married with Computers.
Not with Me!"
"No..., with money."
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org