![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/d57fa0c0e0f61a4609f3fb11bb0728f8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 10:32:19AM -0500, Jim Worrest wrote:
I'm surprisd you mentioned PICO, it's too good of editor. It appears rhat Syeh really wants to suffer, an you might be able to reach those levels with VI
I was weaned on pico. Pico is a nifty editor if you're writing up an email or making a quick change to a file, but it's not exactly a powerhouse. I personally prefer nano (SuSE: are you listening? :), which is a pico clone with some much-needed enhancements.
VI is apparently the editor that's on many rescue disks, so I suppose every Linux user should know something about it :-(
The key to vi's popularity is twofold. Firstly, if you walk up to any UNIX or UNIX-like machine (Solaris, HPUX, IRIX, Linux, *BSD, OpenVMS, etc.), vi is there in one form or another. There is strength in numbers ;). Secondly, vi *is* a powerhouse of an editor; there are countless modifications, enhancements and so forth. -- -=|JP|=- "Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?" Jon Pennington | Atipa Linux Solutions -o) jpennington@atipa.com | http://www.atipa.com /\\ Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000 x1550 _\_V 6D04 39E0 CAE9 9ADA 2CA3 2EBE 898A 6C37 CA1E A29C -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/