19 Aug
2005
19 Aug
'05
07:27
On 8/19/05, Marcus Meissner
The problem is not the license of "mad", its the probably patented algorithms inside (which automatically would void the LGPL/GPL anyway).
How can mad have a license that is "more open" than any one of its components?
However, Realplayer is included in the SUSE Linux products (for openSUSE snapshots it is on the ftp site).
And this is not technically totally legal, I am told.