5 Oct
2014
5 Oct
'14
12:38
On 2014-10-05 07:42, Felix Miata wrote:
Poor as FAT is as a filesystem, it is what it is. A timestamp from a FAT filesystem should not be evaluated or interpreted, just reported. It is what *it* is.
No, it is not. FAT timestamps are relative and have to be interpreted in Linux. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)