24 Jan
2006
24 Jan
'06
20:12
Brad Bourn wrote:
And then there is the underlying, C++ can do C (in fact that is EXACTLY what happens when you compile C++, it basically converts to C) but not the other way around.
AFAIK, g++ moved away from generating C code as an intermediate step quite some time ago. But aren't you contradicting yourself - "C++ can do C" because you could convert C++ code into straight C-code - but then you've effectively got "C doing C++", havent' you? :-) /Per Jessen, Zürich (-6.94 °C) -- http://www.spamchek.com/ - managed anti-spam and anti-virus solution. Let us analyse your spam- and virus-threat - up to 2 months for free.