On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 20:04 +1000, Basil Chupin wrote:
Peo Nilsson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 02:52 -0700, Steve Reilly wrote:
Is this the same driver you speak of that is installed when I did tiny-nvidia-installer --update?
907 frames in 5.0 seconds = 181.314 FPS 991 frames in 5.0 seconds = 198.052 FPS 995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 198.878 FPS 1000 frames in 5.0 seconds = 199.983 FPS 981 frames in 5.0 seconds = 196.103 FPS 992 frames in 5.0 seconds = 198.380 FPS
this is what I get on an athlon xp 2.2 ghz, although I have no complaints..... World of Warcraft and unreal run perfectly. You get 1300 FPS?? maybe were not using the same driver?
Athlon XP 2200+, Nvidia GForce 420 MX, nvidia driver 1.0-8774 gives:
(not full screen)
5757 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1151.400 FPS 6577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1315.400 FPS 7433 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1486.600 FPS 7409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1481.800 FPS 7412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1482.400 FPS
I think the subject of this thread is the latest, 8776, driver. What do you get from glxgears if you installed 8776?
Cheers.
-- A quick survey at this office revealed that the preferred method of getting rid of unwanted pubic hair is to use dental floss.
One thing I have noticed on this thread with geaars fps, no one says what their resolution is. The gears fps depends highly on the resolution, and the only meaningful comparison is with the fps at a resolution. Set gears to full screen, then state the fps for the resolution of the screen. You will get a much more meaningful comparison that way. Art