Problem beim Übersetzen von Samba 2.2.2
Hi, wenn ich die neue Samba-Version von der offiziellen Samba-Site hole und übersetze, funktioniert das zwar, allerdings landen die Dateien in (für SuSE-verwöhnte User) ungewohnten Verzeichnissen. Daher habe ich versucht, aus den Source-rpm (samba-2.2.0-alpha0) von der SuSE-CD die Einstellungen für die Pfade zu übernehmen. Ich fand eine samba.spec Datei, in der die üblichen Verdächtigen (./configure, make, make install) mit haufenweise Variablendefinitionen versehen aufgerufen werden. Versuche ich dieselben Aufrufe nun bei der neuen 2.2.2-Version, bekomme ich die Fehlermeldung summary failure. Aborting config Hat jemand eine Idee, was ich falsch mache, bzw. was ich ändern muß? Meine Konfiguration: SuSE 7.2 Pro i386 Standardinst ohne Office DNS 8.2.5 (seit gestern ;-)
Hi List, can anybody offer a secure alternative to rexec whcih offers the same functionality? --------------------------------------------------------- James Ferrando james@ferrando.co.uk Oxford ZEUS Group
I am told that ssh differs from rexec in that rexec can drop the mother process and leave a daughter running whereas SSH can't. Is this true or will setting an option in ssh solve this problem?
On Thursday, 22. November 2001 11:25, James Ferrando wrote:
can anybody offer a secure alternative to rexec whcih offers the same functionality?
What about "ssh user@host command" ?
Bjoern
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com
James Ferrando wrote:
I am told that ssh differs from rexec in that rexec can drop the mother process and leave a daughter running whereas SSH can't. Is this true or will setting an option in ssh solve this problem?
You know about the nohup command, don't you? I expect ssh host "nohup command &" to leave the process running on the other box. Peter
Ah yes, I'd forgotten about nohup, I'll give it a try... Thanks James --------------------------------------------------------- James Ferrando james@ferrando.co.uk Oxford ZEUS Group On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Peter Wiersig wrote:
James Ferrando wrote:
I am told that ssh differs from rexec in that rexec can drop the mother process and leave a daughter running whereas SSH can't. Is this true or will setting an option in ssh solve this problem?
You know about the nohup command, don't you?
I expect ssh host "nohup command &" to leave the process running on the other box.
Peter
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com
* Peter Wiersig wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:12 +0100:
James Ferrando wrote:
I am told that ssh differs from rexec in that rexec can drop the mother process and leave a daughter running whereas SSH can't. Is this true or will setting an option in ssh solve this problem?
You know about the nohup command, don't you?
-f Requests ssh to go to background after authentica tion is done and forwardings have been established. I would try ssh -f user@host xload oki, Steffen -- Dieses Schreiben wurde maschinell erstellt, es trägt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.
Oops, excuse me - this posting was intended for the other Mailinglist. I just forgot to change the _whole_ address-string. Sorry Roland Hilkenbach
participants (5)
-
Bjoern Engels -
James Ferrando -
Peter Wiersig -
Roland Hilkenbach -
Steffen Dettmer