http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
--- Comment #41 from Rafał Miłecki 2009-06-07 08:47:33 PST ---
More research today...
Bug #13605 has attachment #18640: it shows we use R500PLL* for M76 (rv630)
Bug #16673 has attachment #17780: it shows we use R500PLL* for M72 (rv610)
Bug #17039 has attachment #18186: it shows we use R500PLL* for M76 (rv630)
Bug #17136 has attachment #18282: it shows we use R500PLL* for M76 (rv630)
Bug #17708 has attachment #18246: it shows we use R500PLL* for M76 (rv630)
Bug #16929 has attachment #18071: it shows we use RV620PLL* for rv620
Bug #18393 has attachment #20080: it shows we use RV620PLL* for RS780 (rv610)
Bug #19700 has attachment #22176: it shows we use RV620PLL* for rv620
Bug #21493 has attachment #25334: it shows we use RV620PLL* for RS780 (rv610)
I wasn't able to find out if we use RV620PLL* for rv635 (we should).
I noticed something new for me: RV620PLL* is used also by RS780. I checked if
it's alright to use 420 condition for RS780. For that I used ROM attached to
bug #18393:
013a: 4a65080101 TEST reg[0420] [..X.] <- 01
013f: 494701 JUMP_NotEqual 0147
0142: 0d25140102 OR reg[0450] [...X] <- 02
0147: 51c8 DELAY_MicroSec c8
0149: 0d65140120 OR reg[0450] [..X.] <- 20
So this should be safe to modify RV620PLL1Power and RV620PLL2Power without
adding RV620/RV635/RS780 detecting condition in modified code.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
xorg-team mailing list
xorg-team@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-team