Sorry if I wasn't clear enough but I never asked for everything to be
public, I'm simply pointing a weakness in the proposal draft (that is
the point of a draft)
Since we're about to deal with corporations (just like you pointed)
and hypothetically might face legal suits, "take my word" or even
dissolving the foundation board when something goes wrong aren't
viable solutions anymore, I'm talking about the need to be more
clear/detailed in the manifesto about everything, including what the
board is entitled to share and who takes the responsibility.
I hope I don't get misinterpreted but I'm not attacking this board or
even the board concept by any means, simply pointing something in the
manifesto that could be abused in the future whether the chances are
low, or whether it's an evil company or a guy did a mistake from
inside the foundation board doesn't really matter, the manifesto has
to handle as many scenarios as possible and has to be clear and up to
legal game level.
Imad
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:01 PM jdd@dodin.org
Le 19/06/2019 à 15:51, Imad Aldoj a écrit :
Hi, Obviously, you guys spent a lot of time and research into this so thank you. The only comment I have is about transparency. Since the Foundation's board will automatically have more power(control, donations, etc) there should be more transparency and it should be these "protocols" should be stated clearly to prevent future loopholes.
some discussion with corporations can't be made public :-)
jdd
-- http://dodin.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org