Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 19:33 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
I will say that from the "discussion" here that I feel (I have sufficient lack of expertise to do other than "feel") systemd is the future. I agree, but the discussion (as I see it) has been more about whether to push it into to being the default when it being the default is not really needed nor warranted. (as far as the facts have been presented to us).
I think it should become the default; because maintaining two stacks is just wasted effort [systemd systems and non-systemd systems].
Until every (significant) third party provider of startup scripts has adapted, that will remain the case though. (e.g. HP Proliant Support Pack).
My position is to push back until our integration or systemd has received sufficient testing. It is _easy_ to test and measure for anyone who boots regularly.
There is nobody arguing for including it prior to "sufficient testing".
It's been _included_ since 11.4, but has obviously not been subject to sufficient testing. (it does not currently work in M1). Hence I think we should publisize the advantages of systemd more widely, (perhaps even make it a user install option), thereby attracting more users to test it. I completely appreciate that making systemd the default early means lots of more testing, but it contradicts our idea of an openSUSE that "just works". -- Per Jessen, Zürich (23.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org