On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 13:03 -0400, Ricardo Chung wrote:
+1 Publishing logs on mailinglist serves two purposes: 1) keep people inform about what is going on 2) let some people think about what is going on. So it is possible to ask the right question or giving the right answer. Specially for people who has language barrier and need more time to elaborate in no native language.
I'm curious whether these logs are actually read? Logs have begun to be published in the last couple of months, but I never see any comments on ML about stuff within the logs. For me, reading logs is tedious and de-humanizing compared to reading IRC live. I think if we really want to get people to constructively comment, we have to not be so automated (i.e. publishing logs and be done with it) but to actually come about and write a summary. The problem with that is it requires commitment and time. It is a concept that in its one instance a year ago proves it is worthwhile, but at the same time, risky because it involves points of failure in implementation. Perhaps maybe we agree to form a group of volunteers to write these summaries? I have no problem doing it, but won't do it if I'm the only person. That's why I decided not to continue doing it last year because I didn't want that much weight on me. Bryen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org