On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:20:32 -0800, Fraser_Bell wrote:
On 12/10/20 4:55 AM, Richard Brown wrote:
Hello Adrien,
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 12:28 +0000, Adrien Glauser wrote:
``` Restraint is expected from current and former Board members during elections. When talking about candidates in their capacity of member or former member, they should seek to prioritize means of communication that:
Why should current and former Board members be held to a different standard than any other contributor? Are we not meant to be a community of equals?
I thoroughly agree with Richard on this point. I do not see any reason at all why current and former Board members should be muzzled, as long as they follow the Guiding Principles, which also apply to all others.
I also find this fairly odd. It seems like it would be useful to know if prospective members of the board can work well with the current board, or if there are potential "bad" conflicts. (Not all conflict is "bad" by any means). -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits