Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 13:03 -0400, Ricardo Chung wrote:
+1 Publishing logs on mailinglist serves two purposes: 1) keep people inform about what is going on 2) let some people think about what is going on. So it is possible to ask the right question or giving the right answer. Specially for people who has language barrier and need more time to elaborate in no native language.
I'm curious whether these logs are actually read? Logs have begun to be published in the last couple of months, but I never see any comments on ML about stuff within the logs. For me, reading logs is tedious and de-humanizing compared to reading IRC live.
I've read a couple of the logs, but they're not really easy nor very informative. It's not about the log or the medium, I would be bored reading a transcript of a real life meeting too. As for commenting on the logs, it feels like one is a bit late - the meeting was held, end of story.
I think if we really want to get people to constructively comment, we have to not be so automated (i.e. publishing logs and be done with it) but to actually come about and write a summary. The problem with that is it requires commitment and time.
A summary of the topics discussed, important points raised and decisions made would be good, yes. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (4.4°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org