On Saturday 03 July 2010 12:19:09 jdd wrote:
Le 03/07/2010 15:20, Rajko M. a écrit : ...
I vote for name "Core member" as it describes what current "member" is and avoids permanent confusion that we had with additional meaning that we gave to word "member".
why not?
Why not what? :) (question is to short, so I can't know what you refer too) ...
no, it's already too difficult to know who can be member or not!
Why is that? To me criteria who can be a (registered) member are clear. Make your name stick out of crowd, and you are candidate to be a (registered) member.
In small projects where everyone knows everybody, there is no need for formal recognition. With project of openSUSE size, with 12164 people that found time to create entry in https://users.opensuse.org/ and 426 that applied for membership and are approved there is no chance that everyone knows everyone, so there is a need for formal recognition.
may be, but who knows who do a job? we lack evidences
Who is around can pick enough evidence of activity. Also, by current definition of (registered) membership there are some names that deserve recognition for past activity, but can't be considered members right now. That is another part of attribution that is not solved.
jdd
-- Regards Rajko, -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org